Attitudes towards income inequality: ‘Winners’ versus ‘losers’ of the perceived meritocracy

Karlijn L.A. Roex, Tim Huijts, Inge Sieben

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Individuals with a higher social position are more tolerant of current income inequality than individuals with a lower social position. Besides this, attitudes towards income inequality are influenced by inequality-legitimising myths in a given society. Little is known about how these two factors interact. This study combines these two lines of research and argues that different social strata are more polarised in their attitudes towards inequality in societies with strong prevalent meritocratic perceptions. We expect lower-status individuals (i.e. with a lower income or education) to experience a threat to their group esteem and therefore be less likely to support their society's inequalities in societies with such strong meritocratic perceptions. This hypothesis was tested using data from the International Social Survey Programme 2009 (Social Inequality) on 39 countries. The results show that different social strata are indeed more polarised in their attitudes towards inequality in societies where meritocratic perceptions are more prevalent. Our results are robust for income, but not for education. This suggests that in perceived meritocracies, people regard income as the primary indicator of effort and ability.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)47-63
Number of pages17
JournalActa Sociologica
Volume62
Issue number1
Early online date2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2019

Keywords

  • Income inequality
  • International Social Survey Programme 2009 (Social Inequality)
  • meritocratic perceptions
  • polarisation
  • social identity theory
  • system justification theory
  • UNITED-STATES
  • FAIRNESS
  • BELIEFS
  • LEGITIMATION
  • TOLERANCE
  • SYSTEM
  • LAND

Cite this

@article{792ced0032f444d5af5750c93d61c6a9,
title = "Attitudes towards income inequality: ‘Winners’ versus ‘losers’ of the perceived meritocracy",
abstract = "Individuals with a higher social position are more tolerant of current income inequality than individuals with a lower social position. Besides this, attitudes towards income inequality are influenced by inequality-legitimising myths in a given society. Little is known about how these two factors interact. This study combines these two lines of research and argues that different social strata are more polarised in their attitudes towards inequality in societies with strong prevalent meritocratic perceptions. We expect lower-status individuals (i.e. with a lower income or education) to experience a threat to their group esteem and therefore be less likely to support their society's inequalities in societies with such strong meritocratic perceptions. This hypothesis was tested using data from the International Social Survey Programme 2009 (Social Inequality) on 39 countries. The results show that different social strata are indeed more polarised in their attitudes towards inequality in societies where meritocratic perceptions are more prevalent. Our results are robust for income, but not for education. This suggests that in perceived meritocracies, people regard income as the primary indicator of effort and ability.",
keywords = "Income inequality, International Social Survey Programme 2009 (Social Inequality), meritocratic perceptions, polarisation, social identity theory, system justification theory, UNITED-STATES, FAIRNESS, BELIEFS, LEGITIMATION, TOLERANCE, SYSTEM, LAND",
author = "Roex, {Karlijn L.A.} and Tim Huijts and Inge Sieben",
note = "Datasource: ISSP survey",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1177/0001699317748340",
language = "English",
volume = "62",
pages = "47--63",
journal = "Acta Sociologica",
issn = "0001-6993",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1",

}

Attitudes towards income inequality: ‘Winners’ versus ‘losers’ of the perceived meritocracy. / Roex, Karlijn L.A.; Huijts, Tim; Sieben, Inge.

In: Acta Sociologica, Vol. 62, No. 1, 02.2019, p. 47-63.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attitudes towards income inequality: ‘Winners’ versus ‘losers’ of the perceived meritocracy

AU - Roex, Karlijn L.A.

AU - Huijts, Tim

AU - Sieben, Inge

N1 - Datasource: ISSP survey

PY - 2019/2

Y1 - 2019/2

N2 - Individuals with a higher social position are more tolerant of current income inequality than individuals with a lower social position. Besides this, attitudes towards income inequality are influenced by inequality-legitimising myths in a given society. Little is known about how these two factors interact. This study combines these two lines of research and argues that different social strata are more polarised in their attitudes towards inequality in societies with strong prevalent meritocratic perceptions. We expect lower-status individuals (i.e. with a lower income or education) to experience a threat to their group esteem and therefore be less likely to support their society's inequalities in societies with such strong meritocratic perceptions. This hypothesis was tested using data from the International Social Survey Programme 2009 (Social Inequality) on 39 countries. The results show that different social strata are indeed more polarised in their attitudes towards inequality in societies where meritocratic perceptions are more prevalent. Our results are robust for income, but not for education. This suggests that in perceived meritocracies, people regard income as the primary indicator of effort and ability.

AB - Individuals with a higher social position are more tolerant of current income inequality than individuals with a lower social position. Besides this, attitudes towards income inequality are influenced by inequality-legitimising myths in a given society. Little is known about how these two factors interact. This study combines these two lines of research and argues that different social strata are more polarised in their attitudes towards inequality in societies with strong prevalent meritocratic perceptions. We expect lower-status individuals (i.e. with a lower income or education) to experience a threat to their group esteem and therefore be less likely to support their society's inequalities in societies with such strong meritocratic perceptions. This hypothesis was tested using data from the International Social Survey Programme 2009 (Social Inequality) on 39 countries. The results show that different social strata are indeed more polarised in their attitudes towards inequality in societies where meritocratic perceptions are more prevalent. Our results are robust for income, but not for education. This suggests that in perceived meritocracies, people regard income as the primary indicator of effort and ability.

KW - Income inequality

KW - International Social Survey Programme 2009 (Social Inequality)

KW - meritocratic perceptions

KW - polarisation

KW - social identity theory

KW - system justification theory

KW - UNITED-STATES

KW - FAIRNESS

KW - BELIEFS

KW - LEGITIMATION

KW - TOLERANCE

KW - SYSTEM

KW - LAND

U2 - 10.1177/0001699317748340

DO - 10.1177/0001699317748340

M3 - Article

VL - 62

SP - 47

EP - 63

JO - Acta Sociologica

JF - Acta Sociologica

SN - 0001-6993

IS - 1

ER -