TY - JOUR
T1 - Association of first-line thrombectomy technique and outcome in late-window large vessel occlusion strokes
T2 - A post hoc analysis of the MR CLEAN-LATE trial
AU - Knapen, Robrecht R. M. M.
AU - Olthuis, Susanne G. H.
AU - van Es, Adriaan C. G. M.
AU - Emmer, Bart J.
AU - Schonewille, Wouter J.
AU - van der Leij, Christiaan
AU - van Zwam, Wim H.
AU - van Oostenbrugge, Robert J.
AU - MR CLEAN LATE Trial investigators
PY - 2024/7/1
Y1 - 2024/7/1
N2 - Background: This study aimed to compare direct aspiration, stent retriever, and the combined thrombectomy technique on clinical, safety, and technical outcomes in late-window stroke patients included in the MR CLEAN-LATE trial.Methods: This post hoc analysis of the MR CLEAN-LATE trial included patients treated with direct aspiration, stent retriever, or combined thrombectomy technique as first-line approach. Primary outcome was the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 90 days follow-up, and compared between the three groups with ordinal logistic regression analysis. Secondary outcomes included mortality at 90 days, total technique switches, procedure time, recanalization rate measured with the expanded thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (eTICI) score, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Predefined variables were used for adjustments.Results: In the MR CLEAN-LATE trial, 258 patients underwent endovascular treatment and 232 were included in our analyses. The mRS at 90 days did not differ (stent retriever vs. direct aspiration: adjusted common odds ratio (acOR) = 1.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.73 to 2.50; stent retriever vs. combined: acOR = 1.13, 95% CI = 0.64 to 2.00; direct aspiration vs. combined: acOR = 1.19, 95% CI = 0.64 to 2.21). Direct aspiration thrombectomy was accompanied with more switches to another technique compared to the stent retriever (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 6.50, 95% CI = 2.52 to 16.8) or combined group (aOR = 4.67, 95% CI = 1.80 to 12.1) and with higher sICH rates compared to the combined technique (13% vs. 2.5%; aOR = 8.19, 95% CI = 1.49 to 45.1). Mortality, procedure time, and eTICI did not differ.Conclusion: Stent retriever, direct aspiration, or the combined thrombectomy technique as first-line approach showed no differences in clinical outcome in late-window stroke patients. Direct aspiration was accompanied with higher sICH rates and more switcher to another technique compared to the combined group.
AB - Background: This study aimed to compare direct aspiration, stent retriever, and the combined thrombectomy technique on clinical, safety, and technical outcomes in late-window stroke patients included in the MR CLEAN-LATE trial.Methods: This post hoc analysis of the MR CLEAN-LATE trial included patients treated with direct aspiration, stent retriever, or combined thrombectomy technique as first-line approach. Primary outcome was the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 90 days follow-up, and compared between the three groups with ordinal logistic regression analysis. Secondary outcomes included mortality at 90 days, total technique switches, procedure time, recanalization rate measured with the expanded thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (eTICI) score, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Predefined variables were used for adjustments.Results: In the MR CLEAN-LATE trial, 258 patients underwent endovascular treatment and 232 were included in our analyses. The mRS at 90 days did not differ (stent retriever vs. direct aspiration: adjusted common odds ratio (acOR) = 1.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.73 to 2.50; stent retriever vs. combined: acOR = 1.13, 95% CI = 0.64 to 2.00; direct aspiration vs. combined: acOR = 1.19, 95% CI = 0.64 to 2.21). Direct aspiration thrombectomy was accompanied with more switches to another technique compared to the stent retriever (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 6.50, 95% CI = 2.52 to 16.8) or combined group (aOR = 4.67, 95% CI = 1.80 to 12.1) and with higher sICH rates compared to the combined technique (13% vs. 2.5%; aOR = 8.19, 95% CI = 1.49 to 45.1). Mortality, procedure time, and eTICI did not differ.Conclusion: Stent retriever, direct aspiration, or the combined thrombectomy technique as first-line approach showed no differences in clinical outcome in late-window stroke patients. Direct aspiration was accompanied with higher sICH rates and more switcher to another technique compared to the combined group.
KW - Stroke
KW - intra-arterial thrombectomy
KW - first-line technique
KW - late-window
KW - ISCHEMIC-STROKE
KW - CT-ANGIOGRAPHY
KW - STENT RETRIEVER
KW - OPEN-LABEL
KW - MULTICENTER
KW - ASPIRATION
U2 - 10.1177/17474930241268303
DO - 10.1177/17474930241268303
M3 - Article
SN - 1747-4930
JO - International journal of stroke
JF - International journal of stroke
ER -