Assessment of professionalism: recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference

Brian David Hodges, Shiphra R. Ginsburg, Richard Cruess, Sylvia Cruess, Rhena Delport, Fred Hafferty, Ming-Jung Ho, Eric Holmboe, Matthew Holtman, Sadayoshi Ohbu, Charlotte Rees, Olle Ten Cate, Yusuke Tsugawa, Walther Van Mook, Val Wass, Tim J. Wilkinson, Winnie Wade

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review


Over the past 25 years, professionalism has emerged as a substantive and sustained theme, the operationalization and measurement of which has become a major concern for those involved in medical education. However, how to go about establishing the elements that constitute appropriate professionalism in order to assess them is difficult. Using a discourse analysis approach, the International Ottawa Conference Working Group on Professionalism studied some of the dominant notions of professionalism, and in particular the implications for its assessment. The results presented here reveal different ways of thinking about professionalism that can lead towards a multi-dimensional, multi-paradigmatic approach to assessing professionalism at different levels: individual, inter-personal, societal-institutional. Recommendations for research about professionalism assessment are also presented.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)354-63
Number of pages10
JournalMedical Teacher
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - 2011


  • Behavior
  • Education, Medical
  • Educational Measurement
  • Evaluation Studies as Topic
  • Humans
  • Personality
  • Professional Competence
  • Professional Practice
  • Professional Role
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Teaching
  • Journal Article

Cite this