Assessing differential application of thromboprophylaxis regimes related to risk of pulmonary embolism and mortality in COVID-19 patients through instrumental variable analysis

Linda Nab, Chantal Visser, Bas C T van Bussel, Albertus Beishuizen, Remy H H Bemelmans, Hugo Ten Cate, F Nanne Croles, Coen van Guldener, C Peter C de Jager, Menno V Huisman, Marten R Nijziel, Pieter W Kamphuisen, Frederikus A Klok, Stephanie C E Koster, Nuray Kusadasi, Karina Meijer, Corstiaan A den Uil, Roger E G Schutgens, Frank Stam, Alexander P J VlaarEline A Vlot, Marijke P M Linschoten, Folkert W Asselbergs, Marieke J H A Kruip, Saskia le Cessie, Suzanne C Cannegieter, Dutch Covid and Thrombosis Coalition & the CAPACITY-COVID collaborative consortium

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Thrombotic complications are common in Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients, with pulmonary embolism (PE) being the most frequent. Randomised trials have provided inconclusive results on the optimal dosage of thromboprophylaxis in critically ill COVID-19 patients. We utilized data from the multicentre CAPACITY-COVID patient registry to assess the effect of differential application of Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) dose protocols on PE and in-hospital mortality risk in critically ill COVID-19 patients. An instrumental variable analysis was performed to estimate the intention-to-treat effect, utilizing differences in thromboprophylaxis prescribing behaviour between hospitals. We included 939 patients with PCR confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection from 34 hospitals. Two-hundred-and-one patients (21%) developed a PE. The adjusted cause-specific HR of PE was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.73-1.16) per doubling of LMWH dose. The adjusted cause-specific HR for in-hospital mortality was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.65-1.02) per doubling of LMWH dose. This dose-response relationship was shown to be non-linear. To conclude, this study did not find evidence for an effect of LMWH dose on the risk of PE, but suggested a non-linear decreased risk of in-hospital mortality for higher doses of LMWH. However, uncertainty remains, and the dose-response relationship between LMWH dose and in-hospital mortality needs further investigation in well-designed studies.
Original languageEnglish
Article number10321
Number of pages15
JournalScientific Reports
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 25 Mar 2025

Keywords

  • Aged
  • Anticoagulants/therapeutic use administration & dosage
  • COVID-19
  • COVID-19/mortality complications
  • Critical Illness/mortality
  • Dose–response relationship
  • Drug
  • Female
  • Heparin
  • Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight/therapeutic use administration & dosage
  • Hospital Mortality
  • Hospital mortality
  • Humans
  • Low-molecular-weight
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Pulmonary Embolism/prevention & control mortality etiology
  • Pulmonary embolism
  • Registries
  • SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing differential application of thromboprophylaxis regimes related to risk of pulmonary embolism and mortality in COVID-19 patients through instrumental variable analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this