Abstract
The main argument of this article is that the meaning of the national identity clause of Article 4 (2) TEU should be limited to what its text actually states, namely to a guarantee for the constitutional structures of the European Union (EU) Member States. The article rejects the broader meaning often given to this Treaty provision, namely that it offers a kind of generic protection for national diversity and national constitutional values. Such a broader meaning is not needed, since primary EU law contains many other provisions that protect national diversity, all of which have a specific meaning and role in the EU legal order. Giving Article 4(2) the broader meaning is harmful, as it opens the door to abusive and superficial uses of identity as a justification for non-compliance with EU law obligations from the side of the Member States.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 559-570 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | European Public Law |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Aug 2021 |
Keywords
- national constitutions
- institutional diversity
- cultural diversity
- regional autonomy
- judicial organization
- national languages
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Article 4(2) TEU as a Protection of the Institutional Diversity of the Member States'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver