Abstract
Humans often favour ingroup members over others, a bias that drives discrimination and intergroup conflicts. Hostile relations between groups and homogeneity within groups may affect such ingroup bias. In an experiment with members of three natural groups in Ethiopia, we vary intergroup relations (neutral versus enmity) and exploit the natural variation in the homogeneity of groups (homogeneous versus heterogeneous) to identify their effect on in- and outgroup concerns. We find that ingroup bias largely manifests as positive concern for ingroup members combined with no concern for outgroup members. Enmity has no effect on ingroup bias, whereas ingroup concern is amplified in homogeneous groups. Group homogeneity, thus, is the primary driver of concerns for others in our study’s context. Our results are relevant to understanding the consequences of exclusionary group identities.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 20210419 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences |
Volume | 377 |
Issue number | 1851 |
Early online date | 2022 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 23 May 2022 |
Keywords
- natural groups
- ingroup bias
- enmity
- experiment
- group homogeneity
- SOCIAL IDENTITY
- IN-GROUP
- GROUP MEMBERSHIP
- COOPERATION
- CONFLICT
- IMPACT
- NORM
- ALTRUISM
- LOVE
- IDENTIFICATION