Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Andres: The Unfinished Business of a Seemingly Selective Non-Advantage. Case C-203/16 P Dirk Andres v European Commission: The Unfinished Business of a Seemingly Selective Non-Advantage

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademic

Abstract

The Andres judgement has often been seen as a Milestone on selectivity, but in essence it is not. It rather deals with the absence of an advantage. In this contribution the author revisits Andres and concludes that, from a transactional perspective set forth in Sigma Alimentos Exterior, the outcome could well have been different. He also points out that Andres opened up a loophole to the state aid regime that could be exploited by providing targeted relief to over-inclusive anti-abuse measures. He concludes that it is primarily up to national legislators and domestic courts to guard against disproportional tax measures.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)578-584
Number of pages7
JournalEuropean State Aid Law Quarterly
Volume20
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2021

Keywords

  • advantage
  • selectivity
  • tax measure
  • anti-abuse measure

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Andres: The Unfinished Business of a Seemingly Selective Non-Advantage. Case C-203/16 P Dirk Andres v European Commission: The Unfinished Business of a Seemingly Selective Non-Advantage'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this