Abstract
The Andres judgement has often been seen as a Milestone on selectivity, but in essence it is not. It rather deals with the absence of an advantage. In this contribution the author revisits Andres and concludes that, from a transactional perspective set forth in Sigma Alimentos Exterior, the outcome could well have been different. He also points out that Andres opened up a loophole to the state aid regime that could be exploited by providing targeted relief to over-inclusive anti-abuse measures. He concludes that it is primarily up to national legislators and domestic courts to guard against disproportional tax measures.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 578-584 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | European State Aid Law Quarterly |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2021 |
Keywords
- advantage
- selectivity
- tax measure
- anti-abuse measure
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Andres: The Unfinished Business of a Seemingly Selective Non-Advantage. Case C-203/16 P Dirk Andres v European Commission: The Unfinished Business of a Seemingly Selective Non-Advantage'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver