Analysis of DNA methylation in cancer: location revisited

Alexander Koch, Sophie C. Joosten, Zheng Feng, Tim C. de Ruijter, Muriel X. Draht, Veerle Melotte, Kim M. Smits, Jurgen Veeck, James G. Herman, Leander Van Neste, Wim Van Criekinge, Tim De Meyer, Manon van Engeland*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Changes in DNA methylation in cancer have been heralded as promising targets for the development of powerful diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive biomarkers. Despite the existence of more than 14,000 scientific publications describing DNA methylation-based biomarkers and their clinical associations in cancer, only 14 of these biomarkers have been translated into a commercially available clinical test. Methodological and experimental obstacles are both major causes of this disparity, but the genomic location of a DNA methylation-based biomarker is an intrinsic and essential property that also has an important and often overlooked role. Here, we examine the importance of the location of DNA methylation for the development of cancer biomarkers, and take a detailed look at the genomic location and other relevant characteristics of the various biomarkers with commercially available tests. We also emphasize the value of publicly available databases for the development of DNA methylation-based biomarkers and the importance of accurate reporting of the full methodological details of research findings.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)459-466
Number of pages8
JournalNature Reviews Clinical Oncology
Volume15
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2018

Keywords

  • CPG ISLAND HYPERMETHYLATION
  • CHRONIC LYMPHOCYTIC-LEUKEMIA
  • PROSTATE-CANCER
  • PROMOTER METHYLATION
  • COLORECTAL-CANCER
  • GSTP1 METHYLATION
  • GENE-EXPRESSION
  • GASTRIC-CANCER
  • BLADDER-CANCER
  • CELL CARCINOMA

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Analysis of DNA methylation in cancer: location revisited'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this