Abstract
Outcome measurement is the cornerstone of evidence-based health care including neuropsychological rehabilitation. A complicating factor for outcome measurement in neuropsychological rehabilitation is the enormous number of measures available and the lack of a standard set of outcome measures. As a first step towards such a set, we reviewed intervention evaluation studies of the last 20 years to get an overview of instruments used for measuring outcome. The instruments were divided into two main categories: neuropsychological tests (International Classification of Functioning (ICF) level of functions) and other instruments (all other ICF domains). We considered the most common cognitive domains: memory, attention, executive functions, neglect, perception, apraxia, language/communication and awareness. Instruments used most for measuring outcome were neuropsychological tests (n = 215) in the domains of working memory, reaction times, neglect and aphasia. In the second category (n = 166) the multi-domain instruments were most represented. Several steps can be taken to select a standard set of outcome measures for future use. Next to evaluation of quality and feasibility of the instruments, expert opinion and consensus procedures can be applied.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1598-1623 |
Number of pages | 26 |
Journal | Neuropsychological Rehabilitation |
Volume | 30 |
Issue number | 8 |
Early online date | 2 Apr 2019 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 13 Sept 2020 |
Keywords
- Acquired brain injury
- COGNITIVE REHABILITATION
- CRITERIA
- DEPRESSION RATING-SCALE
- DISABILITY
- FEASIBILITY
- ICF
- INSTRUMENTS
- Neuropsychological
- Outcome measures
- QUALITY-OF-LIFE
- RECOMMENDATIONS
- RESPONSIVENESS
- Rehabilitation
- TOOLS