Abstract
Many pregnant women use pregnancy related mHealth (PRmHealth) applications, encompassing a variety of pregnancy apps and wearables. These are mostly directed at supporting a healthier fetal development. In this article we argue that the increasing dominance of PRmHealth stands in want of empirical knowledge affirming its beneficence in terms of improved pregnancy outcomes. This is a crucial ethical issue, especially in the light of concerns about increasing pressures and growing responsibilities ascribed to pregnant women, which may, in turn, be reinforced by PRmHealth. A point can be made that it would be ethically askew if PRmHealth does not lead to improved pregnancy outcomes, while at the same time increasing maternal duties to closely monitor fetal development. We conclude that more research is needed to get a view on the benefits and burdens of PRmHealth in order to ethically assess whether the latter are proportionate to the former. If not, there is a case in saying that endorsement of PRmHealth is overdemanding.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 677-685 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Medicine Health Care and Philosophy |
Volume | 24 |
Issue number | 4 |
Early online date | Jul 2021 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Dec 2021 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Autonomy
- Fetal patient
- Moral responsibility
- Pregnancy apps
- Wearables
- mHealth