TY - JOUR
T1 - Alternating Treatment With Pazopanib and Everolimus vs Continuous Pazopanib to Delay Disease Progression in Patients With Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Cancer The ROPETAR Randomized Clinical Trial
AU - Cirkel, Geert A.
AU - Hamberg, Paul
AU - Sleijfer, Stefan
AU - Loosveld, Olaf J. L.
AU - Dercksen, M. Wouter
AU - Los, Maartje
AU - Polee, Marco B.
AU - van den Berkmortel, Franchette
AU - Aarts, Maureen J.
AU - Beerepoot, Laurens V.
AU - Groenewegen, Gerard
AU - Lolkema, Martijn P.
AU - Tascilar, Metin
AU - Portielje, Johanna E. A.
AU - Peters, Frank P. J.
AU - Kluempen, Heinz-Josef
AU - van der Noort, Vincent
AU - Haanen, John B. A. G.
AU - Voest, Emile E.
AU - Dutch WIN-O Consortium
PY - 2017/4/1
Y1 - 2017/4/1
N2 - IMPORTANCE To our knowledge, this is the first randomized clinical trial evaluating an alternating treatment regimen in an attempt to delay disease progression in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.OBJECTIVE To test our hypothesis that an 8-week rotating treatment schedule with pazopanib and everolimus delays disease progression, exhibits more favorable toxic effects, and improves quality of life when compared with continuous treatment with pazopanib.DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This was an open-label, randomized (1: 1) study (ROPETAR trial). In total, 101 patients with treatment-naive progressivemetastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma were enrolled between September 2012 and April 2014 from 17 large peripheral or academic hospitals in The Netherlands and followed for at least one year.INTERVENTIONS First-line treatment consisted of either an 8-week alternating treatment schedule of pazopanib 800 mg/d and everolimus 10 mg/d (rotating arm) or continuous pazopanib 800 mg/d (control arm) until progression. After progression, patients made a final rotation to either pazopanib or everolimus monotherapy (rotating arm) or initiated everolimus (control arm).MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES The primary end pointwas survival until first progression or death. Secondary end points included time to second progression or death, toxic effects, and quality of life.RESULTS A total of 52 patients were randomized to the rotating arm (median [range] age, 65 [44-87] years) and 49 patients to the control arm (median [range] age, 67 [38-82] years). Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center risk category was favorable in 26% of patients, intermediate in 58%, and poor in 15%. Baseline characteristics and risk categories were well balanced between arms. One-year PFS1 for rotating treatment was 45%(95% CI, 33-60) and 32%(95% CI, 21-49) for pazopanib (control). Median time until first progression or death for rotating treatment was 7.4 months (95% CI, 5.6-18.4) and 9.4 months (95% CI, 6.6-11.9) for pazopanib (control) (P = .37). Mucositis, anorexia, and dizziness were more prevalent in the rotating arm during first-line treatment. No difference in quality of life was observed.CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Rotating treatment did not result in prolonged progression-free-survival, fewer toxic effects, or improved quality of life. First-line treatment with a vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor remains the optimal approach in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
AB - IMPORTANCE To our knowledge, this is the first randomized clinical trial evaluating an alternating treatment regimen in an attempt to delay disease progression in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.OBJECTIVE To test our hypothesis that an 8-week rotating treatment schedule with pazopanib and everolimus delays disease progression, exhibits more favorable toxic effects, and improves quality of life when compared with continuous treatment with pazopanib.DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This was an open-label, randomized (1: 1) study (ROPETAR trial). In total, 101 patients with treatment-naive progressivemetastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma were enrolled between September 2012 and April 2014 from 17 large peripheral or academic hospitals in The Netherlands and followed for at least one year.INTERVENTIONS First-line treatment consisted of either an 8-week alternating treatment schedule of pazopanib 800 mg/d and everolimus 10 mg/d (rotating arm) or continuous pazopanib 800 mg/d (control arm) until progression. After progression, patients made a final rotation to either pazopanib or everolimus monotherapy (rotating arm) or initiated everolimus (control arm).MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES The primary end pointwas survival until first progression or death. Secondary end points included time to second progression or death, toxic effects, and quality of life.RESULTS A total of 52 patients were randomized to the rotating arm (median [range] age, 65 [44-87] years) and 49 patients to the control arm (median [range] age, 67 [38-82] years). Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center risk category was favorable in 26% of patients, intermediate in 58%, and poor in 15%. Baseline characteristics and risk categories were well balanced between arms. One-year PFS1 for rotating treatment was 45%(95% CI, 33-60) and 32%(95% CI, 21-49) for pazopanib (control). Median time until first progression or death for rotating treatment was 7.4 months (95% CI, 5.6-18.4) and 9.4 months (95% CI, 6.6-11.9) for pazopanib (control) (P = .37). Mucositis, anorexia, and dizziness were more prevalent in the rotating arm during first-line treatment. No difference in quality of life was observed.CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Rotating treatment did not result in prolonged progression-free-survival, fewer toxic effects, or improved quality of life. First-line treatment with a vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor remains the optimal approach in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
KW - PHASE-III TRIAL
KW - SUNITINIB RECHALLENGE
KW - DRUG-RESISTANCE
KW - CARCINOMA
KW - THERAPY
KW - SURVEILLANCE
KW - GUIDELINES
KW - EFFICACY
U2 - 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5202
DO - 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5202
M3 - Article
C2 - 27918762
SN - 2374-2437
VL - 3
SP - 501
EP - 508
JO - JAMA Oncology
JF - JAMA Oncology
IS - 4
ER -