Agenda-setting in the Common Security and Defence Policy: An Institutionalist Perspective

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)
297 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The European Union (EU) has launched an impressive number of crisis management missions since its Common Security and Defence Policy became operational in 2003. This article analyses the agenda-setting phase of these civilian and military operations in order to explain why the EU has sent troops, policemen, judges, prosecutors and monitors across three continents. It presents an institutionalist perspective and argues that the former High Representative Javier Solana and his officials have been instrumental in putting various operations on the agenda. They have employed deliberate agenda-setting strategies, such as venue shopping, conflict expansion and issue framing, to further their bureaucratic interest of launching new missions. Solana and his officials had the ability to affect the agenda-setting process thanks to their pivotal position in policy making. This gave them with superior information on the state of play and an early mover advantage as well as strong international networks. The article provides empirical evidence from the crisis management missions in Aceh, Bosnia, Chad and Kosovo. It concludes with the changes to the Common Security and Defence Policy after the Treaty of Lisbon.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)454-472
Number of pages19
JournalCooperation and Conflict
Volume47
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2012

Keywords

  • COUNCIL SECRETARIAT
  • CSDP
  • DYNAMICS
  • EU
  • EUROPEAN SECURITY
  • European Union
  • Javier Solana
  • MILITARY OPERATION
  • POLITICS
  • POWER
  • UNION
  • agenda-setting
  • institutionalism

Cite this

@article{f75f5af5cea14221be09813235040f98,
title = "Agenda-setting in the Common Security and Defence Policy: An Institutionalist Perspective",
abstract = "The European Union (EU) has launched an impressive number of crisis management missions since its Common Security and Defence Policy became operational in 2003. This article analyses the agenda-setting phase of these civilian and military operations in order to explain why the EU has sent troops, policemen, judges, prosecutors and monitors across three continents. It presents an institutionalist perspective and argues that the former High Representative Javier Solana and his officials have been instrumental in putting various operations on the agenda. They have employed deliberate agenda-setting strategies, such as venue shopping, conflict expansion and issue framing, to further their bureaucratic interest of launching new missions. Solana and his officials had the ability to affect the agenda-setting process thanks to their pivotal position in policy making. This gave them with superior information on the state of play and an early mover advantage as well as strong international networks. The article provides empirical evidence from the crisis management missions in Aceh, Bosnia, Chad and Kosovo. It concludes with the changes to the Common Security and Defence Policy after the Treaty of Lisbon.",
keywords = "COUNCIL SECRETARIAT, CSDP, DYNAMICS, EU, EUROPEAN SECURITY, European Union, Javier Solana, MILITARY OPERATION, POLITICS, POWER, UNION, agenda-setting, institutionalism",
author = "H. Dijkstra",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0010836712462772",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "454--472",
journal = "Cooperation and Conflict",
issn = "0010-8367",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

Agenda-setting in the Common Security and Defence Policy: An Institutionalist Perspective. / Dijkstra, H.

In: Cooperation and Conflict, Vol. 47, No. 4, 01.12.2012, p. 454-472.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Agenda-setting in the Common Security and Defence Policy: An Institutionalist Perspective

AU - Dijkstra, H.

PY - 2012/12/1

Y1 - 2012/12/1

N2 - The European Union (EU) has launched an impressive number of crisis management missions since its Common Security and Defence Policy became operational in 2003. This article analyses the agenda-setting phase of these civilian and military operations in order to explain why the EU has sent troops, policemen, judges, prosecutors and monitors across three continents. It presents an institutionalist perspective and argues that the former High Representative Javier Solana and his officials have been instrumental in putting various operations on the agenda. They have employed deliberate agenda-setting strategies, such as venue shopping, conflict expansion and issue framing, to further their bureaucratic interest of launching new missions. Solana and his officials had the ability to affect the agenda-setting process thanks to their pivotal position in policy making. This gave them with superior information on the state of play and an early mover advantage as well as strong international networks. The article provides empirical evidence from the crisis management missions in Aceh, Bosnia, Chad and Kosovo. It concludes with the changes to the Common Security and Defence Policy after the Treaty of Lisbon.

AB - The European Union (EU) has launched an impressive number of crisis management missions since its Common Security and Defence Policy became operational in 2003. This article analyses the agenda-setting phase of these civilian and military operations in order to explain why the EU has sent troops, policemen, judges, prosecutors and monitors across three continents. It presents an institutionalist perspective and argues that the former High Representative Javier Solana and his officials have been instrumental in putting various operations on the agenda. They have employed deliberate agenda-setting strategies, such as venue shopping, conflict expansion and issue framing, to further their bureaucratic interest of launching new missions. Solana and his officials had the ability to affect the agenda-setting process thanks to their pivotal position in policy making. This gave them with superior information on the state of play and an early mover advantage as well as strong international networks. The article provides empirical evidence from the crisis management missions in Aceh, Bosnia, Chad and Kosovo. It concludes with the changes to the Common Security and Defence Policy after the Treaty of Lisbon.

KW - COUNCIL SECRETARIAT

KW - CSDP

KW - DYNAMICS

KW - EU

KW - EUROPEAN SECURITY

KW - European Union

KW - Javier Solana

KW - MILITARY OPERATION

KW - POLITICS

KW - POWER

KW - UNION

KW - agenda-setting

KW - institutionalism

U2 - 10.1177/0010836712462772

DO - 10.1177/0010836712462772

M3 - Article

VL - 47

SP - 454

EP - 472

JO - Cooperation and Conflict

JF - Cooperation and Conflict

SN - 0010-8367

IS - 4

ER -