Age-related cognitive decline as a function of daytime testing

Andrei Alexandru Puiu*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The current study investigates the effects of age, cognitive load, optimal time-of-day testing, and irrelevant background noise suppression on mental processing. One hundred and seventy-eight young (M=22.97years) and 114 old adults (M=56.38years) were assessed for implicit learning and speed of information processing under irrelevant sound interference early during daytime (7AM-2.30PM) or in the afternoons (3PM-midnight). No direct effect of irrelevant speech effect was found on implicit learning. An optimal time of testing per age group was identified according to the ability to suppress irrelevant auditory information. If no semantic meaning was derived from the sound conditions, irrelevant sound was easily inhibited leaving no room for declined cognitive performance. This suggests an intact phonological inhibition in older adults and a further circumvention of the phonological loop. However, when difficulty was increased, a widened performance gap between young and old people could be observed. Education modulated difficult performance irrespective of age. With increasing age, task demand fulfillment becomes a function of a limited time mechanism. If extraneous time is not adapted to cognitive skills and performance, higher order processing cannot be reached, rendering older adults slower than their younger counterparts.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)333-344
Number of pages12
JournalAging Neuropsychology and Cognition
Volume24
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2017
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Aging
  • cognitive function
  • Irrelevant speech effect
  • information processing
  • higher-order processing
  • IRRELEVANT SPEECH
  • WORKING-MEMORY
  • TIME
  • ADULTS

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Age-related cognitive decline as a function of daytime testing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this