TY - JOUR
T1 - Advancing mechanical recycling of polypropylene
T2 - lessons from sorting, washing, and life cycle assessment
AU - Mager, Moritz
AU - Zeilerbauer, Lukas
AU - Felgel-Farnholz, Alexander
AU - Czaker, Sandra
AU - Fischer, Jörg
AU - Postema, Sander H.J.
AU - Kasper, Johann B.
AU - van Eijk, Marcel C.P.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was realized in the project HiQuPP, which was partly financed by the TKI Chemistry (Topconsortium voor Kennis en Innovatie Chemie) under the PPS allowance of the Ministry of Economic Affairs of the Netherlands. The authors also wish to acknowledge the support of the partners Greiner Packaging International, ENGEL AUSTRIA, Competence Center Chase, Danone, and Van Dam Machines. Furthermore, the authors would like to express their gratitude to their former colleague, Hassan Akhras, for his valuable contributions to this work.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 The Author(s)
PY - 2026/2/1
Y1 - 2026/2/1
N2 - European legislation, particularly the Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR), is rapidly increasing the demand for high-quality recycled polypropylene (PP) in packaging applications. Achieving such qualities through mechanical recycling remains challenging due to the heterogeneity of post-consumer waste, while the role of intensified washing in the overall decontamination remains debated. This study evaluates the influence of additional sorting and washing intensity on material properties, product performance, and environmental impacts in mechanical recycling of Dutch post-consumer rigid PP. White, clear, and colored fractions were processed under cold and hot wash conditions, extruded, and converted into cups by injection molding and thermoforming. Sorting effectively reduced feedstock heterogeneity, while hot washing slightly improved oxidation stability and ductility. Cup testing showed that the investigated recyclates achieved 77–88 % of virgin polypropylene top load performance. Hot washing removed surface contamination but did not significantly reduce volatile organic compounds or migration levels. A Life cycle assessment (LCA) was performed in openLCA using Ecoinvent background data. The results showed that advanced mechanical recycling, despite higher energy and chemical demand, remained environmentally advantageous, achieving significantly lower climate change impacts compared to virgin PP. However, the recyclate substitution rate in final products was identified as the dominant driver of environmental benefits. Overall, maximizing substitution and sorting efficiency proved more effective for achieving sustainable, high-quality PP recycling than intensifying washing.
AB - European legislation, particularly the Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR), is rapidly increasing the demand for high-quality recycled polypropylene (PP) in packaging applications. Achieving such qualities through mechanical recycling remains challenging due to the heterogeneity of post-consumer waste, while the role of intensified washing in the overall decontamination remains debated. This study evaluates the influence of additional sorting and washing intensity on material properties, product performance, and environmental impacts in mechanical recycling of Dutch post-consumer rigid PP. White, clear, and colored fractions were processed under cold and hot wash conditions, extruded, and converted into cups by injection molding and thermoforming. Sorting effectively reduced feedstock heterogeneity, while hot washing slightly improved oxidation stability and ductility. Cup testing showed that the investigated recyclates achieved 77–88 % of virgin polypropylene top load performance. Hot washing removed surface contamination but did not significantly reduce volatile organic compounds or migration levels. A Life cycle assessment (LCA) was performed in openLCA using Ecoinvent background data. The results showed that advanced mechanical recycling, despite higher energy and chemical demand, remained environmentally advantageous, achieving significantly lower climate change impacts compared to virgin PP. However, the recyclate substitution rate in final products was identified as the dominant driver of environmental benefits. Overall, maximizing substitution and sorting efficiency proved more effective for achieving sustainable, high-quality PP recycling than intensifying washing.
KW - Cold washing
KW - Hot washing
KW - Life cycle assessment
KW - Mechanical recycling
KW - Post-consumer polypropylene waste
KW - Substitution rate
U2 - 10.1016/j.wasman.2026.115356
DO - 10.1016/j.wasman.2026.115356
M3 - Article
SN - 0956-053X
VL - 212
JO - Waste Management
JF - Waste Management
M1 - 115356
ER -