Abstract
A comparison is provided between minimally invasive techniques and limited fasciectomy (LF) in the treatment of Dupuytren disease. A technique called percutaneous needle aponeurotomy and lipofilling is described. In a randomized controlled trial, there is no significant difference between this technique and LF after 1 year in contracture correction and recurrent contractures. At 5 years post operation, however, there is a significant change in recurrence rates in favor of LF. Patients with moderate diathesis should choose between minimally invasive technique with early recurrence, fast recovery, and few complications versus late recurrence, slower recovery, and more complications, as observed with LF or dermofasciectomy.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 417-426 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Hand Clinics |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Aug 2018 |
Keywords
- Dupuytren disease
- Fat grafting
- Lipofilling
- Minimally invasive
- Needle fasciotomy
- Needle aponeurotomy
- Fasciectomy
- Dermofasciectomy
- PERCUTANEOUS NEEDLE FASCIOTOMY
- COLLAGENASE CLOSTRIDIUM-HISTOLYTICUM
- RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL
- MESENCHYMAL STEM-CELLS
- SMOOTH MUSCLE ACTIN
- LIMITED FASCIECTOMY
- FOLLOW-UP
- INJECTABLE COLLAGENASE
- CONTRACTURE
- INJECTION
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Advances in Minimally Invasive Treatment of Dupuytren Disease'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver