Advances in Minimally Invasive Treatment of Dupuytren Disease

Steven E. R. Hovius*, Chao Zhou

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

A comparison is provided between minimally invasive techniques and limited fasciectomy (LF) in the treatment of Dupuytren disease. A technique called percutaneous needle aponeurotomy and lipofilling is described. In a randomized controlled trial, there is no significant difference between this technique and LF after 1 year in contracture correction and recurrent contractures. At 5 years post operation, however, there is a significant change in recurrence rates in favor of LF. Patients with moderate diathesis should choose between minimally invasive technique with early recurrence, fast recovery, and few complications versus late recurrence, slower recovery, and more complications, as observed with LF or dermofasciectomy.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)417-426
Number of pages12
JournalHand Clinics
Volume34
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2018

Keywords

  • Dupuytren disease
  • Fat grafting
  • Lipofilling
  • Minimally invasive
  • Needle fasciotomy
  • Needle aponeurotomy
  • Fasciectomy
  • Dermofasciectomy
  • PERCUTANEOUS NEEDLE FASCIOTOMY
  • COLLAGENASE CLOSTRIDIUM-HISTOLYTICUM
  • RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL
  • MESENCHYMAL STEM-CELLS
  • SMOOTH MUSCLE ACTIN
  • LIMITED FASCIECTOMY
  • FOLLOW-UP
  • INJECTABLE COLLAGENASE
  • CONTRACTURE
  • INJECTION

Cite this