Abstract
Aims: To investigate inter-rater reliability, concurrent validity, and feasibility of the German Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI-G) using the mode of observation in a Swiss inpatient rehabilitation setting with the Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM (R)) as criterion.
Methods: Cross-sectional clinimetric study including 36 children and adolescents with median age 10.8 (quartiles 8.7, 13.0) years with neurological/neuro-orthopedic disorders. Data were collected by healthcare professionals through observation. Analyses were performed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC2,1), standard error of measurement (SEMAgreement), Bland-Altman plots, Cohen's Kappa kappa, percentage agreement, and correlations.
Results: Excellent inter-rater reliability (ICCs2,1 >= 0.97), small SEMs and acceptable limits of agreement for the Functional Skills Scale (FSS) and Caregiver Assistance Scale (CAS) were found. No systematic differences between raters existed. Cohen's Kappa for inter-rater agreement of the Modifications Scale (MS) ranged from poor to strong (-0.06 = 0.96), and excellent correlations of FSS and CAS with each other (rho >= 0.98) were identified.
Conclusion: The German PEDI-G seems to be a reliable and valid, but time-consuming tool when applied in an inpatient setting using observation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 345-359 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | 4 Dec 2019 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 3 May 2020 |
Keywords
- Inpatient setting
- observational checklist
- psychometric investigation
- rehabilitation
- AGREEMENT
- REPRODUCIBILITY
- VERSION
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Administration of the German Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI-G) Using the Mode of Observation in Children Undergoing Inpatient Rehabilitation: A Reliability and Validity Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver