Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Additional bypass graft or concomitant surgical ablation? Insights from the HEIST registry

  • Piotr Suwalski
  • , Emil Julian Dabrowski
  • , Jakub Batko
  • , Michal Pasierski
  • , Radoslaw Litwinowicz
  • , Adam Kowalówka
  • , Marek Jasinski
  • , Jan Rogowski
  • , Marek Deja
  • , Krzysztof Bartus
  • , Tong Li
  • , Matteo Matteucci
  • , Wojciech Wanha
  • , Paolo Meani
  • , Daniele Ronco
  • , Giuseppe Maria Raffa
  • , Pietro Giorgio Malvindi
  • , Lukasz Kuzma
  • , Roberto Lorusso
  • , Bart Maesen
  • Mark La Meir, Harold Lazar, Patrick McCarthy, James L Cox, Scott Rankin, Mariusz Kowalewski*
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation at the time of isolated coronary artery bypass grafting is reluctantly attempted. Meanwhile, complete revascularization is not always possible in these patients. We attempted to counterbalance the long-term benefits of surgical ablation against the risks of incomplete revascularization. METHODS: Atrial fibrillation patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting for multivessel disease between 2012 to 2022 and included in the HEart surgery In atrial fibrillation and Supraventricular Tachycardia registry were divided into complete revascularization, complete revascularization with additional grafts, and incomplete revascularization cohorts; these were further split into surgical ablation and non-surgical ablation subgroups. RESULTS: A total of 8,405 patients (78% men; age 69.3 ± 7.9) were included; of those, 5,918 (70.4%) had complete revascularization, and 556 (6.6%) had surgical ablation performed. Number of anastomoses was 2.7 ± 1.2. The median follow-up was 5.1 [interquartile range 2.1-8.8] years. In patients in whom complete revascularization was achieved, surgical ablation was associated with long-term survival benefit: hazard ratio 0.69; 95% confidence intervals (0.50-0.94); P = .020 compared with grafting additional lesions. Similarly, in patients in whom complete revascularization was not achieved, surgical ablation was associated with a long-term survival benefit of 0.68 (0.49-0.94); P = .019. When comparing surgical ablation on top of incomplete revascularization against complete revascularization without additional grafts or surgical ablation, there was no difference between the 2: 0.84 (0.61-1.17); P = .307, which was also consistent in the propensity score-matched analysis: 0.75 (0.39-1.43); P = .379. CONCLUSION: To achieve complete revascularization is of utmost importance. However, when facing incomplete revascularization at the time of coronary artery bypass grafting in a patient with underlying atrial fibrillation, concomitant surgical ablation on top of incomplete revascularization is associated with similar long-term survival as complete revascularization without surgical ablation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)974-983
Number of pages10
JournalSurgery
Volume175
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Additional bypass graft or concomitant surgical ablation? Insights from the HEIST registry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this