Adaptive memory: Stereotype activation is not enough

H.P. Otgaar, T. Smeets, H.L.G.J. Merckelbach, M. Jelicic, B.J. Verschuere, A.M. Galliot, L. van Riel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Studies have shown that survival processing leads to superior memorability. The aim of the present study was to examine whether this survival recall advantage might result from stereotype activation. To test this hypothesis, we conducted a pilot study and two experiments in which participants were primed with stereotypes (Experiment 1, professor and elderly person; Experiment 2, survival-stereotype). In Experiment 1, 120 undergraduates were randomly assigned to a survival, professor stereotype, elderly person stereotype, or moving scenario and rated words for their relevance to the imagined scenario. In Experiment 2, 75 undergraduates were given a survival, survival-stereotype (based on our pilot study), or moving scenario. Both experiments showed that survival processing leads to a greater recall advantage over the stereotype groups and control group. These data indicate that the mere activation of stereotypes cannot explain the survival recall advantage.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1033-1041
JournalMemory & Cognition
Volume39
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2011

Cite this

Otgaar, H.P. ; Smeets, T. ; Merckelbach, H.L.G.J. ; Jelicic, M. ; Verschuere, B.J. ; Galliot, A.M. ; van Riel, L. / Adaptive memory: Stereotype activation is not enough. In: Memory & Cognition. 2011 ; Vol. 39, No. 6. pp. 1033-1041.
@article{9bb4c30f16934899bebdc01f7915f1b2,
title = "Adaptive memory: Stereotype activation is not enough",
abstract = "Studies have shown that survival processing leads to superior memorability. The aim of the present study was to examine whether this survival recall advantage might result from stereotype activation. To test this hypothesis, we conducted a pilot study and two experiments in which participants were primed with stereotypes (Experiment 1, professor and elderly person; Experiment 2, survival-stereotype). In Experiment 1, 120 undergraduates were randomly assigned to a survival, professor stereotype, elderly person stereotype, or moving scenario and rated words for their relevance to the imagined scenario. In Experiment 2, 75 undergraduates were given a survival, survival-stereotype (based on our pilot study), or moving scenario. Both experiments showed that survival processing leads to a greater recall advantage over the stereotype groups and control group. These data indicate that the mere activation of stereotypes cannot explain the survival recall advantage.",
author = "H.P. Otgaar and T. Smeets and H.L.G.J. Merckelbach and M. Jelicic and B.J. Verschuere and A.M. Galliot and {van Riel}, L.",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3758/s13421-011-0091-2",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "1033--1041",
journal = "Memory & Cognition",
issn = "0090-502X",
publisher = "Psychonomic Society",
number = "6",

}

Adaptive memory: Stereotype activation is not enough. / Otgaar, H.P.; Smeets, T.; Merckelbach, H.L.G.J.; Jelicic, M.; Verschuere, B.J.; Galliot, A.M.; van Riel, L.

In: Memory & Cognition, Vol. 39, No. 6, 01.01.2011, p. 1033-1041.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Adaptive memory: Stereotype activation is not enough

AU - Otgaar, H.P.

AU - Smeets, T.

AU - Merckelbach, H.L.G.J.

AU - Jelicic, M.

AU - Verschuere, B.J.

AU - Galliot, A.M.

AU - van Riel, L.

PY - 2011/1/1

Y1 - 2011/1/1

N2 - Studies have shown that survival processing leads to superior memorability. The aim of the present study was to examine whether this survival recall advantage might result from stereotype activation. To test this hypothesis, we conducted a pilot study and two experiments in which participants were primed with stereotypes (Experiment 1, professor and elderly person; Experiment 2, survival-stereotype). In Experiment 1, 120 undergraduates were randomly assigned to a survival, professor stereotype, elderly person stereotype, or moving scenario and rated words for their relevance to the imagined scenario. In Experiment 2, 75 undergraduates were given a survival, survival-stereotype (based on our pilot study), or moving scenario. Both experiments showed that survival processing leads to a greater recall advantage over the stereotype groups and control group. These data indicate that the mere activation of stereotypes cannot explain the survival recall advantage.

AB - Studies have shown that survival processing leads to superior memorability. The aim of the present study was to examine whether this survival recall advantage might result from stereotype activation. To test this hypothesis, we conducted a pilot study and two experiments in which participants were primed with stereotypes (Experiment 1, professor and elderly person; Experiment 2, survival-stereotype). In Experiment 1, 120 undergraduates were randomly assigned to a survival, professor stereotype, elderly person stereotype, or moving scenario and rated words for their relevance to the imagined scenario. In Experiment 2, 75 undergraduates were given a survival, survival-stereotype (based on our pilot study), or moving scenario. Both experiments showed that survival processing leads to a greater recall advantage over the stereotype groups and control group. These data indicate that the mere activation of stereotypes cannot explain the survival recall advantage.

U2 - 10.3758/s13421-011-0091-2

DO - 10.3758/s13421-011-0091-2

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 1033

EP - 1041

JO - Memory & Cognition

JF - Memory & Cognition

SN - 0090-502X

IS - 6

ER -