TY - JOUR
T1 - Acute Endovascular Treatment of Patients With lschemic Stroke From Intracranial Large Vessel Occlusion and Extracranial Carotid Dissection
AU - Compagne, Kars C. J.
AU - Goldhoorn, R. B.
AU - Uyttenboogaart, Maarten
AU - van Oostenbrugge, Robert J.
AU - van Zwam, Wim H.
AU - van Doormaal, Pieter J.
AU - Dippel, Diederik W. J.
AU - van der Lugt, Aad
AU - Emmer, Bart J.
AU - van Es, Adriaan C. G. M.
AU - Majoie, Charles B. L. M.
AU - Roos, Yvo B. W. E. M.
AU - Boiten, Jelis
AU - Vos, Jan Albert
AU - Jansen, Ivo G. H.
AU - Mulder, Maxim J. H. L.
AU - Kappelhof, Manon
AU - Schonewille, Wouter J.
AU - Coutinho, Jonathan M.
AU - Wermer, Marieke J. H.
AU - van Walderveen, Marianne A. A.
AU - Staals, Julie
AU - Hofmeijer, Jeannette
AU - Martens, Jasper M.
AU - Nijeholt, Geert J. Lycklama
AU - Roozenbeek, Bob
AU - de Bruijn, Sebastiaan F.
AU - van Dijk, Lukas C.
AU - van der Worp, H. Bart
AU - Lo, Rob H.
AU - van Dijk, Ewoud J.
AU - Boogaarts, Hieronymus D.
AU - de Kort, Paul L. M.
AU - Peluso, Jo J. P.
AU - van den Berg, Jan S. P.
AU - van Hasselt, Boudewijn A. A. M.
AU - Aerden, Leo A. M.
AU - Dallinga, Ren J.
AU - Eshghi, Omid
AU - Schreuder, Tobien H. C. M. L.
AU - Heijboer, Roel J. J.
AU - Keizer, Koos
AU - Yo, Lonneke S. F.
AU - den Hertog, Heleen M.
AU - Sturm, Emiel J. C.
AU - Sprengers, Marieke E. S.
AU - Jenniskens, Sjoerd F. M.
AU - van den Berg, Rene
AU - Postma, Alida A.
AU - Groot, P. F. C.
AU - MR CLEAN Investigators
N1 - Funding Information:
The MR CLEAN Registry was partly funded by TWIN Foundation, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Maastricht University Medical Center and Academic Medical Center Amsterdam. Erasmus MC received funds from Stryker©R by DD, AvdL, and Bracco Imaging©R by DD. MUMC received funds from Stryker©R and Codman©R for consultations by WZ. The MR CLEAN trial was partly funded by the Dutch Heart Foundation and by unrestricted grants from AngioCare BV, Medtronic/Covidien/EV3©R, MEDAC GmbH/LAMEPRO, Penumbra Inc., Stryker©R , and Top Medical/Concentric.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2019 Compagne, Goldhoorn, Uyttenboogaart, van Oostenbrugge, van Zwam, van Doormaal, Dippel, van der Lugt, Emmer, van Es and the MR CLEAN investigators. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
PY - 2019/2/19
Y1 - 2019/2/19
N2 - Introduction: Carotid artery dissection (CAD) and atherosclerotic carotid artery occlusion (ACAO) are major causes of a tandem occlusion in patients with intracranial large vessel occlusion (LVO). Presence of tandem occlusions may hamper intracranial access and potentially increases the risk of procedural complications of endovascular treatment (EVT). Our aim was to assess neurological, functional and technical outcome and complications of EVT for intracranial LVO in patients with CAD in comparison to patients with ACAO and to patients without CAD or ACAO. Methods: We analyzed data of the MR CLEAN trial intervention arm and MR CLEAN Registry, acquired in 16 Dutch EVT-centers. Primary outcome was the change in stroke severity by comparing the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score at 24–48 h after treatment vs. baseline. Secondary outcomes included reperfusion rate and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). We compared outcomes and complications between patients with CAD vs. patients with ACAO and patients without CAD or ACAO. Results: In total, we identified 74 (4.7%) patients with CAD, 92 (5.9%) patients with ACAO and 1398 (89.4%) patients without CAD or ACAO. Neurological improvement at short-term after EVT in patients with CAD was significantly better compared to ACAO (resp. mean −5 vs. mean −1 NIHSS point; p = 0.03) and did not differ compared to patients without CAD or ACAO (−4 NIHSS points; p = 0.62). Rates of successful reperfusion in patients with CAD (47%) was comparable to patients with ACAO (47%; p = 1.00), but was less often achieved compared to patients without CAD or ACAO (58%; p = 0.08). Occurrence of sICH did not differ significantly between CAD patients (5%) and ACAO (11%; p = 0.33) or without CAD/ACAO (6%; p = 1.00). Conclusion: EVT in patients with intracranial LVO due to CAD results in neurological improvement comparable to patients without tandem occlusions. Therefore, carotid artery dissection by itself should not be a contraindication for endovascular treatment in stroke patients with intracranial large vessel occlusion. Although more challenging endovascular procedures are to be suspected in both patients with CAD or ACAO, accurate distinction between CAD and ACAO might influence clinical decision making as better clinical outcome can be expected in patients with CAD.
AB - Introduction: Carotid artery dissection (CAD) and atherosclerotic carotid artery occlusion (ACAO) are major causes of a tandem occlusion in patients with intracranial large vessel occlusion (LVO). Presence of tandem occlusions may hamper intracranial access and potentially increases the risk of procedural complications of endovascular treatment (EVT). Our aim was to assess neurological, functional and technical outcome and complications of EVT for intracranial LVO in patients with CAD in comparison to patients with ACAO and to patients without CAD or ACAO. Methods: We analyzed data of the MR CLEAN trial intervention arm and MR CLEAN Registry, acquired in 16 Dutch EVT-centers. Primary outcome was the change in stroke severity by comparing the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score at 24–48 h after treatment vs. baseline. Secondary outcomes included reperfusion rate and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). We compared outcomes and complications between patients with CAD vs. patients with ACAO and patients without CAD or ACAO. Results: In total, we identified 74 (4.7%) patients with CAD, 92 (5.9%) patients with ACAO and 1398 (89.4%) patients without CAD or ACAO. Neurological improvement at short-term after EVT in patients with CAD was significantly better compared to ACAO (resp. mean −5 vs. mean −1 NIHSS point; p = 0.03) and did not differ compared to patients without CAD or ACAO (−4 NIHSS points; p = 0.62). Rates of successful reperfusion in patients with CAD (47%) was comparable to patients with ACAO (47%; p = 1.00), but was less often achieved compared to patients without CAD or ACAO (58%; p = 0.08). Occurrence of sICH did not differ significantly between CAD patients (5%) and ACAO (11%; p = 0.33) or without CAD/ACAO (6%; p = 1.00). Conclusion: EVT in patients with intracranial LVO due to CAD results in neurological improvement comparable to patients without tandem occlusions. Therefore, carotid artery dissection by itself should not be a contraindication for endovascular treatment in stroke patients with intracranial large vessel occlusion. Although more challenging endovascular procedures are to be suspected in both patients with CAD or ACAO, accurate distinction between CAD and ACAO might influence clinical decision making as better clinical outcome can be expected in patients with CAD.
KW - ischemic stroke
KW - carotid dissection
KW - endovascular treatment
KW - tandem lesion
KW - thrombectomy
KW - ACUTE ISCHEMIC-STROKE
KW - ARTERY DISSECTION
KW - MECHANICAL THROMBECTOMY
KW - INTRAARTERIAL TREATMENT
KW - MANAGEMENT
KW - REPERFUSION
KW - SCORE
U2 - 10.3389/fneur.2019.00102
DO - 10.3389/fneur.2019.00102
M3 - Article
C2 - 30837934
SN - 1664-2295
VL - 10
SP - 1
EP - 9
JO - Frontiers in Neurology
JF - Frontiers in Neurology
M1 - 102
ER -