TY - JOUR
T1 - Accuracy of remote, video-based supraventricular tachycardia detection in patients undergoing elective electrical cardioversion
T2 - a prospective cohort
AU - Cramer, Iris
AU - van Esch, Rik
AU - Verstappen, Cindy
AU - Kloeze, Carla
AU - van Bussel, Bas
AU - Stuijk, Sander
AU - Bergmans, Jan
AU - van 't Veer, Marcel
AU - Zinger, Svitlana
AU - Montenij, Leon
AU - Bouwman, R. Arthur
AU - Dekker, Lukas
PY - 2025/1/29
Y1 - 2025/1/29
N2 - Unobtrusive pulse rate monitoring by continuous video recording, based on remote photoplethysmography (rPPG), might enable early detection of perioperative arrhythmias in general ward patients. However, the accuracy of an rPPG-based machine learning model to monitor the pulse rate during sinus rhythm and arrhythmias is unknown. We conducted a prospective, observational diagnostic study in a cohort with a high prevalence of arrhythmias (patients undergoing elective electrical cardioversion). Pulse rate was assessed with rPPG via a visible light camera and ECG as reference, before and after cardioversion. A cardiologist categorized ECGs into normal sinus rhythm or arrhythmias requiring further investigation. A supervised machine learning model (support vector machine with Gaussian kernel) was trained using rPPG signal features from 60-s intervals and validated via leave-one-subject-out. Pulse rate measurement performance was evaluated with Bland-Altman analysis. Of 72 patients screened, 51 patients were included in the analyses, including 444 60-s intervals with normal sinus rhythm and 1130 60-s intervals of clinically relevant arrhythmias. The model showed robust discrimination (AUC 0.95 [0.93-0.96]) and good calibration. For pulse rate measurement, the bias and limits of agreement for sinus rhythm were 1.21 [- 8.60 to 11.02], while for arrhythmia, they were - 7.45 [- 35.75 to 20.86]. The machine learning model accurately identified sinus rhythm and arrhythmias using rPPG in real-world conditions. Heart rate underestimation during arrhythmias highlights the need for optimization.
AB - Unobtrusive pulse rate monitoring by continuous video recording, based on remote photoplethysmography (rPPG), might enable early detection of perioperative arrhythmias in general ward patients. However, the accuracy of an rPPG-based machine learning model to monitor the pulse rate during sinus rhythm and arrhythmias is unknown. We conducted a prospective, observational diagnostic study in a cohort with a high prevalence of arrhythmias (patients undergoing elective electrical cardioversion). Pulse rate was assessed with rPPG via a visible light camera and ECG as reference, before and after cardioversion. A cardiologist categorized ECGs into normal sinus rhythm or arrhythmias requiring further investigation. A supervised machine learning model (support vector machine with Gaussian kernel) was trained using rPPG signal features from 60-s intervals and validated via leave-one-subject-out. Pulse rate measurement performance was evaluated with Bland-Altman analysis. Of 72 patients screened, 51 patients were included in the analyses, including 444 60-s intervals with normal sinus rhythm and 1130 60-s intervals of clinically relevant arrhythmias. The model showed robust discrimination (AUC 0.95 [0.93-0.96]) and good calibration. For pulse rate measurement, the bias and limits of agreement for sinus rhythm were 1.21 [- 8.60 to 11.02], while for arrhythmia, they were - 7.45 [- 35.75 to 20.86]. The machine learning model accurately identified sinus rhythm and arrhythmias using rPPG in real-world conditions. Heart rate underestimation during arrhythmias highlights the need for optimization.
KW - Physiologic monitoring
KW - Remote photoplethysmography
KW - Supraventricular tachycardia
KW - Video-camera
KW - ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION
KW - PHOTOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY
U2 - 10.1007/s10877-025-01263-5
DO - 10.1007/s10877-025-01263-5
M3 - Article
SN - 1387-1307
JO - Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
JF - Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
ER -