A systematic review found no consistent difference in effect between more and less intensive placebo interventions

M. Fässler, K. Meissner, J. Kleijnen, A. Hróbjartsson, K. Linde

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: It has been suggested that some placebo interventions might be associated with larger clinical effects than others. In a systematic review, we investigated whether there is evidence from direct comparisons in randomized clinical trials including two or more placebo groups supporting this hypothesis. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Eligible trials were identified through electronic database searches and citation tracking up to February 2013. Placebo interventions in a trial were categorized into a more intense and a less intense intervention based on complexity, invasiveness, or route of administration and time needed for application. RESULTS: Twelve studies with 1,059 patients receiving placebo met the eligibility criteria. Studies were highly heterogeneous regarding patients, interventions, outcomes, and risk of bias. Seven studies did not find any significant differences between the more intense and the less intense placebo intervention, four studies found differences for single outcomes, and one study consistently reported significantly larger effects of the more intense placebo. An explorative meta-analysis yielded a standardized mean difference -0.22 (95% confidence interval: -0.46, 0.02; P = 0.07; I2 = 68%). CONCLUSION: In the studies included in this review, more intense placebos were not consistently associated with larger effects than less intense placebos.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)442-451
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume68
Issue number4
Early online date17 Dec 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2015

Keywords

  • Placebos
  • Placebo effect
  • Randomized controlled trial
  • Systematic review
  • Therapy
  • Treatment outcome
  • RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS
  • ACUPUNCTURE
  • MIGRAINE
  • PAIN
  • EFFICACY
  • ASTHMA
  • METAANALYSIS
  • DEPRESSION
  • ALBUTEROL
  • THERAPY

Cite this

@article{ff39910c306649c98983eedf7bd50c7a,
title = "A systematic review found no consistent difference in effect between more and less intensive placebo interventions",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: It has been suggested that some placebo interventions might be associated with larger clinical effects than others. In a systematic review, we investigated whether there is evidence from direct comparisons in randomized clinical trials including two or more placebo groups supporting this hypothesis. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Eligible trials were identified through electronic database searches and citation tracking up to February 2013. Placebo interventions in a trial were categorized into a more intense and a less intense intervention based on complexity, invasiveness, or route of administration and time needed for application. RESULTS: Twelve studies with 1,059 patients receiving placebo met the eligibility criteria. Studies were highly heterogeneous regarding patients, interventions, outcomes, and risk of bias. Seven studies did not find any significant differences between the more intense and the less intense placebo intervention, four studies found differences for single outcomes, and one study consistently reported significantly larger effects of the more intense placebo. An explorative meta-analysis yielded a standardized mean difference -0.22 (95{\%} confidence interval: -0.46, 0.02; P = 0.07; I2 = 68{\%}). CONCLUSION: In the studies included in this review, more intense placebos were not consistently associated with larger effects than less intense placebos.",
keywords = "Placebos, Placebo effect, Randomized controlled trial, Systematic review, Therapy, Treatment outcome, RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS, ACUPUNCTURE, MIGRAINE, PAIN, EFFICACY, ASTHMA, METAANALYSIS, DEPRESSION, ALBUTEROL, THERAPY",
author = "M. F{\"a}ssler and K. Meissner and J. Kleijnen and A. Hr{\'o}bjartsson and K. Linde",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.018",
language = "English",
volume = "68",
pages = "442--451",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Epidemiology",
issn = "0895-4356",
publisher = "Elsevier Science",
number = "4",

}

A systematic review found no consistent difference in effect between more and less intensive placebo interventions. / Fässler, M.; Meissner, K.; Kleijnen, J.; Hróbjartsson, A.; Linde, K.

In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 68, No. 4, 04.2015, p. 442-451.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A systematic review found no consistent difference in effect between more and less intensive placebo interventions

AU - Fässler, M.

AU - Meissner, K.

AU - Kleijnen, J.

AU - Hróbjartsson, A.

AU - Linde, K.

PY - 2015/4

Y1 - 2015/4

N2 - OBJECTIVES: It has been suggested that some placebo interventions might be associated with larger clinical effects than others. In a systematic review, we investigated whether there is evidence from direct comparisons in randomized clinical trials including two or more placebo groups supporting this hypothesis. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Eligible trials were identified through electronic database searches and citation tracking up to February 2013. Placebo interventions in a trial were categorized into a more intense and a less intense intervention based on complexity, invasiveness, or route of administration and time needed for application. RESULTS: Twelve studies with 1,059 patients receiving placebo met the eligibility criteria. Studies were highly heterogeneous regarding patients, interventions, outcomes, and risk of bias. Seven studies did not find any significant differences between the more intense and the less intense placebo intervention, four studies found differences for single outcomes, and one study consistently reported significantly larger effects of the more intense placebo. An explorative meta-analysis yielded a standardized mean difference -0.22 (95% confidence interval: -0.46, 0.02; P = 0.07; I2 = 68%). CONCLUSION: In the studies included in this review, more intense placebos were not consistently associated with larger effects than less intense placebos.

AB - OBJECTIVES: It has been suggested that some placebo interventions might be associated with larger clinical effects than others. In a systematic review, we investigated whether there is evidence from direct comparisons in randomized clinical trials including two or more placebo groups supporting this hypothesis. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Eligible trials were identified through electronic database searches and citation tracking up to February 2013. Placebo interventions in a trial were categorized into a more intense and a less intense intervention based on complexity, invasiveness, or route of administration and time needed for application. RESULTS: Twelve studies with 1,059 patients receiving placebo met the eligibility criteria. Studies were highly heterogeneous regarding patients, interventions, outcomes, and risk of bias. Seven studies did not find any significant differences between the more intense and the less intense placebo intervention, four studies found differences for single outcomes, and one study consistently reported significantly larger effects of the more intense placebo. An explorative meta-analysis yielded a standardized mean difference -0.22 (95% confidence interval: -0.46, 0.02; P = 0.07; I2 = 68%). CONCLUSION: In the studies included in this review, more intense placebos were not consistently associated with larger effects than less intense placebos.

KW - Placebos

KW - Placebo effect

KW - Randomized controlled trial

KW - Systematic review

KW - Therapy

KW - Treatment outcome

KW - RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS

KW - ACUPUNCTURE

KW - MIGRAINE

KW - PAIN

KW - EFFICACY

KW - ASTHMA

KW - METAANALYSIS

KW - DEPRESSION

KW - ALBUTEROL

KW - THERAPY

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.018

DO - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.018

M3 - Article

VL - 68

SP - 442

EP - 451

JO - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

SN - 0895-4356

IS - 4

ER -