A Study on Defeasibility and Defeaters in International Law: Process or Procedure Distinction Against the Non-Discrimination Rule

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademic

50 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This is a paper on legal logic and defeasibility in international law. It argues that exceptions to rules are defeaters to such rules. The paper does that by using the World Trade Organisation’s (WTO) case law on the rule of non-discrimination and exceptions grounded on process or procedure method (PPM) distinctions. By arguing that rules have defeaters, this paper indirectly claims that legal reasoning is defeasible. Further, this investigation also serves as a criticism of accounts of legal reasoning as syllogistic deductive reasoning.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationTribunais internacionais e a garantia dos direitos sociais
EditorsWagner Menezes
Place of PublicationCuritiba
PublisherBrazilian Academy of International Law
Pages199-229
ISBN (Electronic)978-65-9964-370-5
ISBN (Print)978-65-9964-370-5
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Cite this