A simple method for co-segregation analysis to evaluate the pathogenicity of unclassified variants; BRCA1 and BRCA2 as an example

Leila Mohammadi, Maaike P. Vreeswijk, Rogier Oldenburg, Ans van den Ouweland, Jan C. Oosterwijk, Annemarie H. van der Hout, Nicoline Hoogerbrugge, Marjolijn Ligtenberg, Margreet G. Ausems, Rob B. van der Luijt, Charlotte J. Dommering, Johan J. Gille, Senno Verhoef, Frans B. Hogervorst, Theo A. van Os, Encarna Gomez Garcia, Marinus J. Blok, Juul T. Wijnen, Quinta Helmer, Peter DevileeChristi J. van Asperen*, Hans C. van Houwelingen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Assessment of the clinical significance of unclassified variants (UVs) identified in BRCA1 and BRCA2 is very important for genetic counselling. The analysis of co-segregation of the variant with the disease in families is a powerful tool for the classification of these variants. Statistical methods have been described in literature but these methods are not always easy to apply in a diagnostic setting.Methods: We have developed an easy to use method which calculates the likelihood ratio (LR) of an UV being deleterious, with penetrance as a function of age of onset, thereby avoiding the use of liability classes. The application of this algorithm is publicly available http://www.msbi.nl/cosegregation. It can easily be used in a diagnostic setting since it requires only information on gender, genotype, present age and/or age of onset for breast and/or ovarian cancer.Results: We have used the algorithm to calculate the likelihood ratio in favour of causality for 3 UVs in BRCA1 (p.M18T, p.S1655F and p.R1699Q) and 5 in BRCA2 (p.E462G p.Y2660D, p.R2784Q, p.R3052W and p.R3052Q). Likelihood ratios varied from 0.097 (BRCA2, p.E462G) to 230.69 (BRCA2, p.Y2660D). Typing distantly related individuals with extreme phenotypes (i.e. very early onset cancer or old healthy individuals) are most informative and give the strongest likelihood ratios for or against causality.Conclusion: Although co-segregation analysis on itself is in most cases insufficient to prove pathogenicity of an UV, this method simplifies the use of co-segregation as one of the key features in a multifactorial approach considerably.
Original languageEnglish
Article number211
Number of pages11
JournalBMC Cancer
Volume9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 29 Jun 2009

Keywords

  • Unknown clinical-significance
  • Dna-sequence variants
  • Cancer-susceptibility
  • Missense variants
  • Genes
  • Breast
  • Classification
  • Causality
  • Mutations
  • Model

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A simple method for co-segregation analysis to evaluate the pathogenicity of unclassified variants; BRCA1 and BRCA2 as an example'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this