A Risk Assessment Tool for Predicting Fragility Fractures and Mortality in the Elderly

Thach Tran*, Dana Bliuc, Hanh M. Pham, Tineke van Geel, Jonathan D. Adachi, Claudie Berger, Joop van den Bergh, John A. Eisman, Piet Geusens, David Goltzman, David A. Hanley, Robert G. Josse, Stephanie M. Kaiser, Christopher S. Kovacs, Lisa Langsetmo, Jerilynn C. Prior, Tuan Nguyen, Jacqueline R. Center, CaMos Research Group

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

78 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Existing fracture risk assessment tools are not designed to predict fracture-associated consequences, possibly contributing to the current undermanagement of fragility fractures worldwide. We aimed to develop a risk assessment tool for predicting the conceptual risk of fragility fractures and its consequences. The study involved 8965 people aged >= 60 years from the Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study and the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study. Incident fracture was identified from X-ray reports and questionnaires, and death was ascertained though contact with a family member or obituary review. We used a multistate model to quantify the effects of the predictors on the transition risks to an initial and subsequent incident fracture and mortality, accounting for their complex interrelationships, confounding effects, and death as a competing risk. There were 2364 initial fractures, 755 subsequent fractures, and 3300 deaths during a median follow-up of 13 years (interquartile range [IQR] 7-15). The prediction model included sex, age, bone mineral density, history of falls within 12 previous months, prior fracture after the age of 50 years, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes mellitus, chronic pulmonary diseases, hypertension, and cancer. The model accurately predicted fragility fractures up to 11 years of follow-up and post-fracture mortality up to 9 years, ranging from 7 years after hip fractures to 15 years after non-hip fractures. For example, a 70-year-old woman with aT-score of -1.5 and without other risk factors would have 10% chance of sustaining a fracture and an 8% risk of dying in 5 years. However, after an initial fracture, her risk of sustaining another fracture or dying doubles to 33%, ranging from 26% after a distal to 42% post hip fracture. A robust statistical technique was used to develop a prediction model for individualization of progression to fracture and its consequences, facilitating informed decision making about risk and thus treatment for individuals with different risk profiles. (c) 2020 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1923-1934
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Bone and Mineral Research
Volume35
Issue number10
Early online date30 Jul 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2020

Keywords

  • FRAGILITY FRACTURE
  • MORTALITY
  • MULTISTATE PREDICTION MODEL
  • OSTEOPOROSIS
  • SUBSEQUENT FRACTURE
  • CANADIAN MULTICENTER OSTEOPOROSIS
  • HIP FRACTURE
  • MULTISTATE MODELS
  • POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN
  • VERTEBRAL FRACTURE
  • MEN
  • DENSITY
  • CHOICE
  • CANCER

Cite this