A Lab Model for Symptom Exaggeration: What do we need?

Isabella Niesten, Harald Merckelbach, Alfons van Impelen, Marko Jelicic, Angel Manderson, Minyi Cheng

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This article reflects on the current state of the art in research on individuals who exaggerate their symptoms (i.e., feigning). We argue that the most commonly used approach in this field, namely simply providing research participants with instructions to overreport symptoms, is valuable for validating measures that tap into symptom exaggeration, but is less suitable for addressing the theoretical foundations of feigning. That is, feigning serves to actively mislead others and is done deliberately. These characteristics produce experiences (e.g., feelings of guilt) in individuals who feign that lab research in its current form is unable to accommodate for. Paradigms that take these factors into account may not only yield more ecologically valid data, but may also stimulate a shift from the study of how to detect feigning to more fundamental issues. One such issue is the cognitive dissonance (e.g., feelings of guilt) that - in some cases - accompanies feigning and that may foster internalized fabrications. We present three studies (N's = 78, 60, and 54) in which we tried to abate current issues and discuss their merits for future research. (C) Copyright 2016 Textrum Ltd. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)55-75
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychopathology
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Keywords

  • symptom validity
  • malingering
  • feigning
  • simulation designs
  • cognitive dissonance
  • COGNITIVE-DISSONANCE
  • DECEPTION
  • ATTRIBUTION
  • FAKING

Cite this

Niesten, Isabella ; Merckelbach, Harald ; van Impelen, Alfons ; Jelicic, Marko ; Manderson, Angel ; Cheng, Minyi. / A Lab Model for Symptom Exaggeration: What do we need?. In: Journal of Experimental Psychopathology. 2017 ; Vol. 8, No. 1. pp. 55-75.
@article{e6ac29145e2c4735bfe16eeefd88af6b,
title = "A Lab Model for Symptom Exaggeration: What do we need?",
abstract = "This article reflects on the current state of the art in research on individuals who exaggerate their symptoms (i.e., feigning). We argue that the most commonly used approach in this field, namely simply providing research participants with instructions to overreport symptoms, is valuable for validating measures that tap into symptom exaggeration, but is less suitable for addressing the theoretical foundations of feigning. That is, feigning serves to actively mislead others and is done deliberately. These characteristics produce experiences (e.g., feelings of guilt) in individuals who feign that lab research in its current form is unable to accommodate for. Paradigms that take these factors into account may not only yield more ecologically valid data, but may also stimulate a shift from the study of how to detect feigning to more fundamental issues. One such issue is the cognitive dissonance (e.g., feelings of guilt) that - in some cases - accompanies feigning and that may foster internalized fabrications. We present three studies (N's = 78, 60, and 54) in which we tried to abate current issues and discuss their merits for future research. (C) Copyright 2016 Textrum Ltd. All rights reserved.",
keywords = "symptom validity, malingering, feigning, simulation designs, cognitive dissonance, COGNITIVE-DISSONANCE, DECEPTION, ATTRIBUTION, FAKING",
author = "Isabella Niesten and Harald Merckelbach and {van Impelen}, Alfons and Marko Jelicic and Angel Manderson and Minyi Cheng",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.5127/jep.051815",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "55--75",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychopathology",
issn = "2043-8087",
publisher = "Textrum",
number = "1",

}

A Lab Model for Symptom Exaggeration: What do we need? / Niesten, Isabella; Merckelbach, Harald; van Impelen, Alfons; Jelicic, Marko; Manderson, Angel ; Cheng, Minyi.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychopathology, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2017, p. 55-75.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Lab Model for Symptom Exaggeration: What do we need?

AU - Niesten, Isabella

AU - Merckelbach, Harald

AU - van Impelen, Alfons

AU - Jelicic, Marko

AU - Manderson, Angel

AU - Cheng, Minyi

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - This article reflects on the current state of the art in research on individuals who exaggerate their symptoms (i.e., feigning). We argue that the most commonly used approach in this field, namely simply providing research participants with instructions to overreport symptoms, is valuable for validating measures that tap into symptom exaggeration, but is less suitable for addressing the theoretical foundations of feigning. That is, feigning serves to actively mislead others and is done deliberately. These characteristics produce experiences (e.g., feelings of guilt) in individuals who feign that lab research in its current form is unable to accommodate for. Paradigms that take these factors into account may not only yield more ecologically valid data, but may also stimulate a shift from the study of how to detect feigning to more fundamental issues. One such issue is the cognitive dissonance (e.g., feelings of guilt) that - in some cases - accompanies feigning and that may foster internalized fabrications. We present three studies (N's = 78, 60, and 54) in which we tried to abate current issues and discuss their merits for future research. (C) Copyright 2016 Textrum Ltd. All rights reserved.

AB - This article reflects on the current state of the art in research on individuals who exaggerate their symptoms (i.e., feigning). We argue that the most commonly used approach in this field, namely simply providing research participants with instructions to overreport symptoms, is valuable for validating measures that tap into symptom exaggeration, but is less suitable for addressing the theoretical foundations of feigning. That is, feigning serves to actively mislead others and is done deliberately. These characteristics produce experiences (e.g., feelings of guilt) in individuals who feign that lab research in its current form is unable to accommodate for. Paradigms that take these factors into account may not only yield more ecologically valid data, but may also stimulate a shift from the study of how to detect feigning to more fundamental issues. One such issue is the cognitive dissonance (e.g., feelings of guilt) that - in some cases - accompanies feigning and that may foster internalized fabrications. We present three studies (N's = 78, 60, and 54) in which we tried to abate current issues and discuss their merits for future research. (C) Copyright 2016 Textrum Ltd. All rights reserved.

KW - symptom validity

KW - malingering

KW - feigning

KW - simulation designs

KW - cognitive dissonance

KW - COGNITIVE-DISSONANCE

KW - DECEPTION

KW - ATTRIBUTION

KW - FAKING

U2 - 10.5127/jep.051815

DO - 10.5127/jep.051815

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 55

EP - 75

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychopathology

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychopathology

SN - 2043-8087

IS - 1

ER -