A history of assessment in medical education

Lambert W. T. Schuwirth*, Cees P. M. van der Vleuten

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

530 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The way quality of assessment has been perceived and assured has changed considerably in the recent 5 decades. Originally, assessment was mainly seen as a measurement problem with the aim to tell people apart, the competent from the not competent. Logically, reproducibility or reliability and construct validity were seen as necessary and sufficient for assessment quality and the role of human judgement was minimised. Later, assessment moved back into the authentic workplace with various workplace-based assessment (WBA) methods. Although originally approached from the same measurement framework, WBA and other assessments gradually became assessment processes that included or embraced human judgement but based on good support and assessment expertise. Currently, assessment is treated as a whole system problem in which competence is evaluated from an integrated rather than a reductionist perspective. Current research therefore focuses on how to support and improve human judgement, how to triangulate assessment information meaningfully and how to construct fairness, credibility and defensibility from a systems perspective. But, given the rapid changes in society, education and healthcare, yet another evolution in our thinking about good assessment is likely to lurk around the corner.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1045-1056
Number of pages12
JournalAdvances in Health Sciences Education
Volume25
Issue number5
Early online date28 Oct 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2020

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • History
  • Programmatic assessment
  • Workplace based assessment
  • PROGRAMMATIC ASSESSMENT
  • PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE
  • SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT
  • PERFORMANCE
  • PITFALLS
  • PURSUIT
  • OBJECTIVITY
  • VALIDITY
  • FEEDBACK
  • CULTURE

Cite this