A Demonstration of a Semi-Structured Legal Reasoning Framework

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference article in proceedingAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Legal reasoning strikes a balance between structured elements (i.e. legal criteria and their connections) and unstructured elements (i.e. about of the applicability of open-textured legal terms). Expert systems perform well on the former task, while large language models offer significant potential in the latter style of reasoning. In this demonstration, we present the DALLMA framework, which enables the combination of these two approaches, for semi-structured reasoning. This approach has the potential to assist in many legal reasoning and drafting tasks, while reducing the risks of hallucinations, with important implications for e.g. access to justice.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the Twentieth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
EditorsJuliano Maranhao
Place of PublicationNew York
PublisherAssociation for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Pages504-505
Number of pages2
ISBN (Electronic)9798400719394
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Jan 2026
Event20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ICAIL 2025 - Chicago, United States
Duration: 16 Jun 202520 Jun 2025
https://sites.northwestern.edu/icail2025/

Conference

Conference20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ICAIL 2025
Abbreviated titleICAIL 2025
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityChicago
Period16/06/2520/06/25
Internet address

Keywords

  • access to justice
  • forms
  • Generative AI
  • Large Language Models
  • legal reasoning

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Demonstration of a Semi-Structured Legal Reasoning Framework'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this