Abstract
Legal reasoning strikes a balance between structured elements (i.e. legal criteria and their connections) and unstructured elements (i.e. about of the applicability of open-textured legal terms). Expert systems perform well on the former task, while large language models offer significant potential in the latter style of reasoning. In this demonstration, we present the DALLMA framework, which enables the combination of these two approaches, for semi-structured reasoning. This approach has the potential to assist in many legal reasoning and drafting tasks, while reducing the risks of hallucinations, with important implications for e.g. access to justice.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Proceedings of the Twentieth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law |
| Editors | Juliano Maranhao |
| Place of Publication | New York |
| Publisher | Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) |
| Pages | 504-505 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9798400719394 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 13 Jan 2026 |
| Event | 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ICAIL 2025 - Chicago, United States Duration: 16 Jun 2025 → 20 Jun 2025 https://sites.northwestern.edu/icail2025/ |
Conference
| Conference | 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ICAIL 2025 |
|---|---|
| Abbreviated title | ICAIL 2025 |
| Country/Territory | United States |
| City | Chicago |
| Period | 16/06/25 → 20/06/25 |
| Internet address |
Keywords
- access to justice
- forms
- Generative AI
- Large Language Models
- legal reasoning
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A Demonstration of a Semi-Structured Legal Reasoning Framework'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver