A critical examination of sport discipline typology: identifying inherent limitations and deficiencies in contemporary classification systems

Magdalena Johanna Konopka*, Hans Keizer, Gerard Rietjens, Maurice Petrus Zeegers, Billy Sperlich

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Exercise scientists (especially in the field of biomolecular research) frequently classify athletic cohorts into categories such as endurance, strength, or mixed, and create a practical framework for studying diverse athletic populations between seemingly similar groups. It is crucial to recognize the limitations and complexities of these classifications, as they may oversimplify the multidimensional characteristics of each sport. If so, the validity of studies dealing with such approaches may become compromised and the comparability across different studies challenging or impossible. This perspective critically examines and highlights the issues associated with current sports typologies, critiques existing sports classification systems, and emphasizes the imperative for a universally accepted classification model to enhance the quality of biomolecular research of sports in the future.
Original languageEnglish
Article number1389844
Number of pages8
JournalFrontiers in physiology
Volume15
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 Jul 2024

Keywords

  • athlete
  • classification
  • endurance
  • framework
  • strength
  • typologies
  • ENZYME I/D POLYMORPHISM
  • ENDURANCE EXERCISE
  • RUNNING PERFORMANCE
  • ADAPTIVE RESPONSE
  • ELITE
  • STRENGTH
  • GENE
  • ATHLETE
  • ADAPTATIONS
  • MUSCLE

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A critical examination of sport discipline typology: identifying inherent limitations and deficiencies in contemporary classification systems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this