A Critical Comparison of Offline Focus Groups, Online Focus Groups and E-Delphi

E.C. Brüggen*, P. Willems

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The boom in online marketing research represents one of the fastest-growing segments of the research industry. Although the design and quality of online surveys has received widespread attention, little empirical research compares the effectiveness of online and offline qualitative research techniques. Therefore, this research compares offline focus groups, online focus groups and e-Delphi with respect to depth, breadth, efficiency, group dynamics, non-verbal impressions and attitudes of respondents. Results show that offline focus group results have the highest depth and breadth, and are most efficient, leading to high-quality outcomes. However, e-Delphi discussions provide very elaborate and relatively deep outcomes that give a good impression of respondents' feelings and attitudes. Results from online focus groups remain rather superficial, but experts value the spontaneous reactions and interactiveness, and consider online focus groups very efficient.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)363-381
Number of pages19
JournalInternational Journal of Market Research
Volume51
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2009

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Critical Comparison of Offline Focus Groups, Online Focus Groups and E-Delphi'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this