INIS
comparative evaluations
100%
planning
100%
density
100%
energy
100%
protons
100%
computerized tomography
100%
monte carlo method
100%
extraction
100%
images
50%
cat scanning
50%
doses
37%
patients
37%
phantoms
37%
dose distributions
37%
risks
25%
errors
25%
accuracy
25%
organs
25%
conversion
25%
tumors
12%
humans
12%
computer codes
12%
brain
12%
range
12%
datasets
12%
roots
12%
calibration
12%
interpolation
12%
electron density
12%
Keyphrases
Proton
100%
Dual-energy CT
100%
Extraction Methods
100%
CT Density
100%
Monte-Carlo Planning
100%
Density Extraction
100%
CT Images
33%
Dose Distribution
33%
At-risk
22%
CT-based
22%
Mass Density
22%
Conversion Method
22%
Proton Dose Calculation
22%
DirectDensity
22%
Monoenergetic Images
22%
Phantom
11%
Phantom Study
11%
Treatment Plan
11%
Monte Carlo
11%
Acquisition Mode
11%
Method Study
11%
Calibration Method
11%
Head CT Scan
11%
Relative Difference
11%
Commercial Software
11%
Proton Therapy
11%
CT Acquisition
11%
Brain Tumor
11%
Prescribed Dose
11%
Root Mean Square Error
11%
Range Difference
11%
Relative Electron Density
11%
Accuracy Study
11%
TM Image
11%
Distribution Difference
11%
Piecewise Linear Interpolation
11%
Reference Phantom
11%
Proton Dose
11%
Energy Image
11%
Chemistry
Isolation Method
100%
Instrument Calibration
100%
Electron Density
100%
Earth and Planetary Sciences
Interpolation
100%
Electron Density
100%
Root-Mean-Square Error
100%
Medicine and Dentistry
Treatment Planning
100%
Dual Energy Computed Tomography
100%
Dose Calculation
40%
Intracranial Tumor
20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Dual Energy Computed Tomography
100%
Radiation Dose Distribution
60%
X-Ray Computed Tomography
20%