A Comparison of Methods for Poverty Estimation in Developing Countries

Sumon Das, Stephen Haslett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Small area estimation is a widely used indirect estimation technique for micro‐level geographic profiling. Three unit level small area estimation techniques—the ELL or World Bank method, empirical best prediction (EBP) and M‐quantile (MQ) — can estimate micro‐level Foster, Greer, & Thorbecke (FGT) indicators: poverty incidence, gap and severity using both unit level survey and census data. However, they use different assumptions. The effects of using model‐based unit level census data reconstructed from cross‐tabulations and having no cluster level contextual variables for models are discussed, as are effects of small area and cluster level heterogeneity. A simulation‐based comparison of ELL, EBP and MQ uses a model‐based reconstruction of 2000/2001 data from Bangladesh and compares bias and mean square error. A three‐level ELL method is applied for comparison with the standard two‐level ELL that lacks a small area level component. An important finding is that the larger number of small areas for which ELL has been able to produce sufficiently accurate estimates in comparison with EBP and MQ has been driven more by the type of census data available or utilised than by the model per se.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)368-392
Number of pages25
JournalInternational Statistical Review
Volume87
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2019

Keywords

  • CENSUS
  • ELL
  • M-QUANTILE MODELS
  • M-quantile
  • MEAN-SQUARED ERROR
  • SMALL-AREA ESTIMATION
  • empirical best prediction
  • small area estimation
  • unit record census data

Cite this

@article{eb533db8b37f4db3b39fd1d004a82f21,
title = "A Comparison of Methods for Poverty Estimation in Developing Countries",
abstract = "Small area estimation is a widely used indirect estimation technique for micro‐level geographic profiling. Three unit level small area estimation techniques—the ELL or World Bank method, empirical best prediction (EBP) and M‐quantile (MQ) — can estimate micro‐level Foster, Greer, & Thorbecke (FGT) indicators: poverty incidence, gap and severity using both unit level survey and census data. However, they use different assumptions. The effects of using model‐based unit level census data reconstructed from cross‐tabulations and having no cluster level contextual variables for models are discussed, as are effects of small area and cluster level heterogeneity. A simulation‐based comparison of ELL, EBP and MQ uses a model‐based reconstruction of 2000/2001 data from Bangladesh and compares bias and mean square error. A three‐level ELL method is applied for comparison with the standard two‐level ELL that lacks a small area level component. An important finding is that the larger number of small areas for which ELL has been able to produce sufficiently accurate estimates in comparison with EBP and MQ has been driven more by the type of census data available or utilised than by the model per se.",
keywords = "CENSUS, ELL, M-QUANTILE MODELS, M-quantile, MEAN-SQUARED ERROR, SMALL-AREA ESTIMATION, empirical best prediction, small area estimation, unit record census data",
author = "Sumon Das and Stephen Haslett",
note = "data source: Bangladesh Household Income and Expenditure Survey 2000 and Bangladesh Population and Housing Census 2001 has been used for the study.",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1111/insr.12314",
language = "English",
volume = "87",
pages = "368--392",
journal = "International Statistical Review",
issn = "0306-7734",
publisher = "International Statistical Institute",
number = "2",

}

A Comparison of Methods for Poverty Estimation in Developing Countries. / Das, Sumon; Haslett, Stephen .

In: International Statistical Review, Vol. 87, No. 2, 08.2019, p. 368-392.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Comparison of Methods for Poverty Estimation in Developing Countries

AU - Das, Sumon

AU - Haslett, Stephen

N1 - data source: Bangladesh Household Income and Expenditure Survey 2000 and Bangladesh Population and Housing Census 2001 has been used for the study.

PY - 2019/8

Y1 - 2019/8

N2 - Small area estimation is a widely used indirect estimation technique for micro‐level geographic profiling. Three unit level small area estimation techniques—the ELL or World Bank method, empirical best prediction (EBP) and M‐quantile (MQ) — can estimate micro‐level Foster, Greer, & Thorbecke (FGT) indicators: poverty incidence, gap and severity using both unit level survey and census data. However, they use different assumptions. The effects of using model‐based unit level census data reconstructed from cross‐tabulations and having no cluster level contextual variables for models are discussed, as are effects of small area and cluster level heterogeneity. A simulation‐based comparison of ELL, EBP and MQ uses a model‐based reconstruction of 2000/2001 data from Bangladesh and compares bias and mean square error. A three‐level ELL method is applied for comparison with the standard two‐level ELL that lacks a small area level component. An important finding is that the larger number of small areas for which ELL has been able to produce sufficiently accurate estimates in comparison with EBP and MQ has been driven more by the type of census data available or utilised than by the model per se.

AB - Small area estimation is a widely used indirect estimation technique for micro‐level geographic profiling. Three unit level small area estimation techniques—the ELL or World Bank method, empirical best prediction (EBP) and M‐quantile (MQ) — can estimate micro‐level Foster, Greer, & Thorbecke (FGT) indicators: poverty incidence, gap and severity using both unit level survey and census data. However, they use different assumptions. The effects of using model‐based unit level census data reconstructed from cross‐tabulations and having no cluster level contextual variables for models are discussed, as are effects of small area and cluster level heterogeneity. A simulation‐based comparison of ELL, EBP and MQ uses a model‐based reconstruction of 2000/2001 data from Bangladesh and compares bias and mean square error. A three‐level ELL method is applied for comparison with the standard two‐level ELL that lacks a small area level component. An important finding is that the larger number of small areas for which ELL has been able to produce sufficiently accurate estimates in comparison with EBP and MQ has been driven more by the type of census data available or utilised than by the model per se.

KW - CENSUS

KW - ELL

KW - M-QUANTILE MODELS

KW - M-quantile

KW - MEAN-SQUARED ERROR

KW - SMALL-AREA ESTIMATION

KW - empirical best prediction

KW - small area estimation

KW - unit record census data

U2 - 10.1111/insr.12314

DO - 10.1111/insr.12314

M3 - Article

VL - 87

SP - 368

EP - 392

JO - International Statistical Review

JF - International Statistical Review

SN - 0306-7734

IS - 2

ER -