A breakfast with alpha-lactalbumin, gelatin, or gelatin + TRP lowers energy intake at lunch compared with a breakfast with casein, soy, whey, or whey-GMP.

M.A.B. Veldhorst*, A.G. Nieuwenhuizen, A. Waelen, K.R. Westerterp, M.P. Engelen, R.J. Brummer, N.E. Deutz, M.S. Westerterp-Plantenga

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    101 Downloads (Pure)


    BACKGROUND & AIMS: Dietary protein plays a role in body weight regulation, partly due to its effects on satiety. The objective was to compare the effects of casein-, soy-, whey-, whey without glycomacropeptide (GMP)-, alpha-lactalbumin-, gelatin-, or gelatin with tryptophan (TRP)-protein breakfasts at two concentrations on subsequent satiety and energy intake (EI). METHODS: Twenty-four healthy subjects (mean+/-SEM BMI: 24.8+/-0.5kg/m(2); age: 25+/-2years) received a breakfast; a custard with casein, soy, whey, whey-GMP, alpha-lactalbumin, gelatin, or gelatin+TRP as protein source with either 10/55/35 (normal) or 25/55/20 (high) En% protein/carbohydrate/fat in a randomized, single-blind design. At the precedingly determined time point for lunch, 180min, subjects were offered an ad lib lunch. Appetite profile (Visual Analogue Scales, VAS) and EI were determined. RESULTS: Both at the level of 10 and 25 En% from protein, EI at lunch was approximately 20% lower after an alpha-lactalbumin or gelatin (+TRP) breakfast (2.5+/-0.2MJ) compared with after a casein, soy, or whey-GMP breakfast (3.2+/-0.3MJ, p<0.05). Appetite ratings at 180min differed 15-25mm ( approximately 40%, p<0.05) between types of protein. Differences in EI were a function of differences in appetite ratings (R(2)=0.4, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Different proteins (alpha-lactalbumin, gelatin, gelatin+TRP) that are approximately 40% more satiating than other proteins (casein, soy, whey, whey-GMP) induce a related approximately 20% reduction of subsequent energy intake.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)147-155
    JournalClinical Nutrition
    Issue number2
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2009

    Cite this