A barrier analysis for distributed recycling of 3D printing waste: Taking the maker movement perspective

Bob Peeters, Nadine Kiratli*, Janjaap Semeijn

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The democratization of manufacturing, led by personal fabrication tools such as three-dimensional (3D) printers, demands evaluations of the sustainability of such practices. To demonstrate the circular economy potential of personal fabrication through 3D printing (3DP), this study seeks a better understanding of the barriers to distributed recycling of 3DP waste in a maker movement context. Interviews with those involved in the maker movement and related potential stakeholders reveal barriers that hinder local recycling of 3DP waste. An interpretive structural modeling (ISM) method clarifies the structures of the relationships among the barriers, to identify the most cumbersome ones that hinder the local recycling of 3DP waste. The findings provide academics and practitioners with deeper insights into the barriers to distributed recycling of 3DP waste, as well as ideas for accelerating innovative 3DP solutions for sustainability.
Original languageEnglish
Article number118313
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Cleaner Production
Volume241
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Dec 2019

Keywords

  • 3D printing
  • Sustainability
  • Circular economy
  • Maker movement
  • Distributed recycling
  • Interpretive structural modeling (ISM)
  • CIRCULAR ECONOMY
  • ISM APPROACH
  • POLYMER
  • INTERVIEW
  • SUSTAINABILITY
  • POLYETHYLENE
  • FABRICATION

Cite this

@article{dd04b78ba5ac422a838264f746ca8f20,
title = "A barrier analysis for distributed recycling of 3D printing waste: Taking the maker movement perspective",
abstract = "The democratization of manufacturing, led by personal fabrication tools such as three-dimensional (3D) printers, demands evaluations of the sustainability of such practices. To demonstrate the circular economy potential of personal fabrication through 3D printing (3DP), this study seeks a better understanding of the barriers to distributed recycling of 3DP waste in a maker movement context. Interviews with those involved in the maker movement and related potential stakeholders reveal barriers that hinder local recycling of 3DP waste. An interpretive structural modeling (ISM) method clarifies the structures of the relationships among the barriers, to identify the most cumbersome ones that hinder the local recycling of 3DP waste. The findings provide academics and practitioners with deeper insights into the barriers to distributed recycling of 3DP waste, as well as ideas for accelerating innovative 3DP solutions for sustainability.",
keywords = "3D printing, Sustainability, Circular economy, Maker movement, Distributed recycling, Interpretive structural modeling (ISM), CIRCULAR ECONOMY, ISM APPROACH, POLYMER, INTERVIEW, SUSTAINABILITY, POLYETHYLENE, FABRICATION",
author = "Bob Peeters and Nadine Kiratli and Janjaap Semeijn",
note = "data source: Interviews with those involved in the maker movement and related potential stakeholders",
year = "2019",
month = "12",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118313",
language = "English",
volume = "241",
journal = "Journal of Cleaner Production",
issn = "0959-6526",
publisher = "ELSEVIER SCI LTD",

}

A barrier analysis for distributed recycling of 3D printing waste : Taking the maker movement perspective. / Peeters, Bob; Kiratli, Nadine; Semeijn, Janjaap.

In: Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 241, 118313, 20.12.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A barrier analysis for distributed recycling of 3D printing waste

T2 - Taking the maker movement perspective

AU - Peeters, Bob

AU - Kiratli, Nadine

AU - Semeijn, Janjaap

N1 - data source: Interviews with those involved in the maker movement and related potential stakeholders

PY - 2019/12/20

Y1 - 2019/12/20

N2 - The democratization of manufacturing, led by personal fabrication tools such as three-dimensional (3D) printers, demands evaluations of the sustainability of such practices. To demonstrate the circular economy potential of personal fabrication through 3D printing (3DP), this study seeks a better understanding of the barriers to distributed recycling of 3DP waste in a maker movement context. Interviews with those involved in the maker movement and related potential stakeholders reveal barriers that hinder local recycling of 3DP waste. An interpretive structural modeling (ISM) method clarifies the structures of the relationships among the barriers, to identify the most cumbersome ones that hinder the local recycling of 3DP waste. The findings provide academics and practitioners with deeper insights into the barriers to distributed recycling of 3DP waste, as well as ideas for accelerating innovative 3DP solutions for sustainability.

AB - The democratization of manufacturing, led by personal fabrication tools such as three-dimensional (3D) printers, demands evaluations of the sustainability of such practices. To demonstrate the circular economy potential of personal fabrication through 3D printing (3DP), this study seeks a better understanding of the barriers to distributed recycling of 3DP waste in a maker movement context. Interviews with those involved in the maker movement and related potential stakeholders reveal barriers that hinder local recycling of 3DP waste. An interpretive structural modeling (ISM) method clarifies the structures of the relationships among the barriers, to identify the most cumbersome ones that hinder the local recycling of 3DP waste. The findings provide academics and practitioners with deeper insights into the barriers to distributed recycling of 3DP waste, as well as ideas for accelerating innovative 3DP solutions for sustainability.

KW - 3D printing

KW - Sustainability

KW - Circular economy

KW - Maker movement

KW - Distributed recycling

KW - Interpretive structural modeling (ISM)

KW - CIRCULAR ECONOMY

KW - ISM APPROACH

KW - POLYMER

KW - INTERVIEW

KW - SUSTAINABILITY

KW - POLYETHYLENE

KW - FABRICATION

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118313

DO - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118313

M3 - Article

VL - 241

JO - Journal of Cleaner Production

JF - Journal of Cleaner Production

SN - 0959-6526

M1 - 118313

ER -