Explaining the EU's Uneven Influence Across the International Regime Complex in Shadow Banking

Lucia Quaglia, Aneta Spendzharova*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This article shows that the EU has exerted uneven influence within the global regime complex in shadow banking. Why? We seek to explain the variation in the EU's ability to exert influence across different elemental regimes-those on hedge funds and securitization-in the broader regime complex over time. In hedge funds regulation, the EU has pursued more stringent international rules, to no avail. In securitization, the EU has been more successful in promoting more lenient regulation at the international level. We focus on the EU's internal cohesiveness (which can change over time) as the key explanatory variable.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)6-16
Number of pages11
JournalPolitics and Governance
Volume11
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Keywords

  • Bank of England
  • EU cohesiveness
  • European Central Bank
  • finance
  • hedge funds
  • international regime complexity
  • securitization
  • shadow banking
  • EUROPEAN-UNION
  • EXTERNAL EFFECTIVENESS
  • POLITICAL-ECONOMY
  • GLOBAL REGULATOR
  • COHESIVENESS
  • SPEAKING
  • CRISIS
  • POLICY

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Explaining the EU's Uneven Influence Across the International Regime Complex in Shadow Banking'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this