Estimating prevalence of subjective cognitive decline in and across international cohort studies of aging: a COSMIC study

Susanne Roehr*, Alexander Pabst, Steffi G. Riedel-Heller, Frank Jessen, Yuda Turana, Yvonne S. Handajani, Carol Brayne, Fiona E. Matthews, Blossom C. M. Stephan, Richard B. Lipton, Mindy J. Katz, Cuiling Wang, Maelenn Guerchet, Pierre-Marie Preux, Pascal Mbelesso, Karen Ritchie, Marie-Laure Ancelin, Isabelle Carriere, Antonio Guaita, Annalisa DavinRoberta Vaccaro, Ki Woong Kim, Ji Won Han, Seung Wan Suh, Suzana Shahar, Normah C. Din, Divya Vanoh, Martin van Boxtel, Sebastian Koehler, Mary Ganguli, Erin P. Jacobsen, Beth E. Snitz, Kaarin J. Anstey, Nicolas Cherbuin, Shuzo Kumagai, Sanmei Chen, Kenji Narazaki, Tze Pin Ng, Qi Gao, Xinyi Gwee, Henry Brodaty, Nicole A. Kochan, Julian Trollor, Antonio Lobo, Raul Lopez-Anton, Javier Santabarbara, John D. Crawford, Darren M. Lipnicki, Perminder S. Sachdev, Cohort Studies of Memory in an International Consortium (COSMIC)

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) is recognized as a risk stage for Alzheimer's disease (AD) and other dementias, but its prevalence is not well known. We aimed to use uniform criteria to better estimate SCD prevalence across international cohorts. Methods We combined individual participant data for 16 cohorts from 15 countries (members of the COSMIC consortium) and used qualitative and quantitative (Item Response Theory/IRT) harmonization techniques to estimate SCD prevalence. Results The sample comprised 39,387 cognitively unimpaired individuals above age 60. The prevalence of SCD across studies was around one quarter with both qualitative harmonization/QH (23.8%, 95%CI = 23.3-24.4%) and IRT (25.6%, 95%CI = 25.1-26.1%); however, prevalence estimates varied largely between studies (QH 6.1%, 95%CI = 5.1-7.0%, to 52.7%, 95%CI = 47.4-58.0%; IRT: 7.8%, 95%CI = 6.8-8.9%, to 52.7%, 95%CI = 47.4-58.0%). Across studies, SCD prevalence was higher in men than women, in lower levels of education, in Asian and Black African people compared to White people, in lower- and middle-income countries compared to high-income countries, and in studies conducted in later decades. Conclusions SCD is frequent in old age. Having a quarter of older individuals with SCD warrants further investigation of its significance, as a risk stage for AD and other dementias, and of ways to help individuals with SCD who seek medical advice. Moreover, a standardized instrument to measure SCD is needed to overcome the measurement variability currently dominant in the field.

Original languageEnglish
Article number167
Number of pages14
JournalAlzheimers research & therapy
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Dec 2020

Keywords

  • Subjective cognitive decline
  • Prevalence
  • Epidemiology
  • Individual participant data
  • Data harmonization
  • Cohort study
  • MINI-MENTAL-STATE
  • MEMORY COMPLAINTS
  • DEMENTIA
  • DETERIORATION
  • PERFORMANCE
  • COMMUNITY
  • FRAMEWORK
  • CRITERIA
  • PEOPLE
  • HEALTH

Cite this