What proportion of clinical prediction models make it to clinical practice? Protocol for a two-track follow-up study of prediction model development publications

Banafsheh Arshi, Laure Wynants, Eline Rijnhart, Kelly Reeve, Laura Elizabeth Cowley, Luc J. Smits*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Introduction It is known that only a limited proportion of developed clinical prediction models (CPMs) are implemented and/or used in clinical practice. This may result in a large amount of research waste, even when considering that some CPMs may demonstrate poor performance. Cross-sectional estimates of the numbers of CPMs that have been developed, validated, evaluated for impact or utilized in practice, have been made in specific medical fields, but studies across multiple fields and studies following up the fate of CPMs are lacking. Methods and analysis We have conducted a systematic search for prediction model studies published between January 1995 and December 2020 using the Pubmed and Embase databases, applying a validated search strategy. Taking random samples for every calendar year, abstracts and articles were screened until a target of 100 CPM development studies were identified. Next, we will perform a forward citation search of the resulting CPM development article cohort to identify articles on external validation, impact assessment or implementation of those CPMs. We will also invite the authors of the development studies to complete an online survey to track implementation and clinical utilization of the CPMs. We will conduct a descriptive synthesis of the included studies, using data from the forward citation search and online survey to quantify the proportion of developed models that are validated, assessed for their impact, implemented and/or used in patient care. We will conduct time-to-event analysis using Kaplan-Meier plots. Ethics and dissemination No patient data are involved in the research. Most information will be extracted from published articles. We request written informed consent from the survey respondents. Results will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at international conferences. OSF registration (https://osf.io/nj8s9).
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere073174
Number of pages6
JournalBMJ Open
Volume13
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 May 2023

Keywords

  • EPIDEMIOLOGY
  • Primary Prevention
  • Prognosis

Cite this