INIS
breasts
100%
patients
82%
surgery
44%
implants
35%
reviews
31%
cancer
22%
comparative evaluations
21%
quality of life
20%
women
19%
fats
17%
therapy
15%
skin
14%
wounds
14%
nerves
13%
assessments
12%
data
12%
tissues
11%
risks
11%
arteries
11%
evaluation
10%
volume
9%
silicones
9%
healing
9%
humans
9%
reduction
8%
cosmetics
7%
levels
7%
netherlands
6%
skin cancer
6%
glutamine
6%
Medicine and Dentistry
Breast Reconstruction
56%
Quality of Life
21%
Breast Implant
20%
Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap
19%
Systematic Review
14%
Breast Cancer
13%
Mastectomy
10%
Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema
9%
Lymphedema
9%
Surgeon
9%
Sensation
9%
Implant
8%
Lymphovenous Anastomosis
8%
Microsurgery
8%
Donor Site
8%
Patient-Reported Outcome
8%
Cosmetics
7%
Skin Cancer
6%
Patient Satisfaction
6%
Perforator Flap
6%
Randomized Controlled Trial
6%
Diseases
6%
Free Tissue Graft
5%
Plagiocephaly
5%
Prevalence
5%
Cohort Analysis
5%
Meta-Analysis
5%
Arm
5%
Keyphrases
Breast Reconstruction
29%
Breast
22%
DIEP Flap
18%
Quality of Life
15%
Flap
14%
Autologous Fat Transfer
14%
Breast Implants
13%
Autologous Breast Reconstruction
13%
Scar
10%
Dutch
10%
Breast Cancer-related Lymphedema
9%
Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction
9%
Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
9%
Lymphovenous Anastomosis
8%
Netherlands
8%
Patient Satisfaction
7%
Silicone Breast Implants
7%
Lymphedema
7%
Nerve Coaptation
7%
Mastectomy
6%
Glutamine
6%
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)
5%
Breast Implant Illness
5%
Donor Site
5%
Immediate Breast Reconstruction
5%
Positional Plagiocephaly
5%
Patients with Breast Cancer
5%
Sensory Recovery
5%
Meta-analysis
5%
Skin Cancer
5%