If you made any changes in Pure these will be visible here soon.

Research Output 2011 2020

2020

A model statement does not enhance the verifiability approach

Bogaard, G., Meijer, E. H. & Van der Plas, I., Jan 2020, In : Applied Cognitive Psychology. 34, 1, p. 96-105 10 p.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2019

A comparison of different investigative interviewing techniques in generating differential recall enhancement and detecting deception

De Rosa, J., Hiscock-Anisman, C., Blythe, A., Bogaard, G., Hally, A. & Colwell, K., Jan 2019, In : Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling. 16, 1, p. 44-58 15 p.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Using the Reality Interview improves the accuracy of the Criteria Based Content Analysis and Reality Monitoring

Bogaard, G., Colwell, K. & Crans, S., Nov 2019, In : Applied Cognitive Psychology. 33, 6, p. 1018-1031 14 p.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Open Access
2018

Self-Reported Beliefs About Verbal Cues Correlate with Deception-Detection Performance

Bogaard, G. & Meijer, E. H., 2018, In : Applied Cognitive Psychology. 32, 1, p. 129-137

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Open Access
2017
900 Downloads (Pure)
Open Access
File

The Verifiability Approach to detection of malingered physical symptoms

Boskovic, I., Bogaard, G., Merckelbach, H., Vrij, A. & Hope, L., 2017, In : Psychology Crime & Law. 23, 8, p. 717-729

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Open Access
2016
130 Downloads (Pure)

Scientific Content Analysis (SCAN) Cannot Distinguish Between Truthful and Fabricated Accounts of a Negative Event

Bogaard, G., Meijer, E. H., Vrij, A. & Merckelbach, H., 25 Feb 2016, In : Frontiers in Psychology. 7, 243.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Open Access
File

Screenen met SCAN? Liever niet

Bogaard, G., Meijer, E. H. & Merckelbach, H., 2016, In : Panopticon. Tijdschrift voor strafrecht, criminologie en forensisch welzijnwerk.. 37, p. 197-210

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleProfessional

134 Downloads (Pure)

Strong, but Wrong: Lay People's and Police Officers' Beliefs about Verbal and Nonverbal Cues to Deception

Bogaard, G., Meijer, E. H., Vrij, A. & Merckelbach, H., 3 Jun 2016, In : PLOS ONE. 11, 6, 19 p., e0156615.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Open Access
File

Verbale leugendetectie wizards

Bogaard, G. & Meijer, E. H., 2016, Apeldoorn: Politie en Wetenschap. (Politiekunde, Vol. 80).

Research output: Book/ReportBookProfessional

Open Access
2014
7 Citations (Scopus)
4 Citations (Scopus)

SCAN is largely driven by 12 criteria: results from sexual abuse statements

Bogaard, G., Meijer, E., Vrij, A., Broers, N. & Merckelbach, H., 28 May 2014, In : Psychology Crime & Law. 20, 5, p. 430-449 20 p.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Using an Example Statement Increases Information but Does Not Increase Accuracy of CBCA, RM, and SCAN

Bogaard, G., Meijer, E. H. & Vrij, A., Jun 2014, In : Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling. 11, 2, p. 151-163 13 p.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2011

Leugenaars praten anders

Bogaard, G., Meijer, E. H., Vrij, A. & Merckelbach, H. L. G. J., 1 Jan 2011, In : De Psycholoog. 46, p. 10-19

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleProfessional